An overview of US state drought plans: crisis or risk management?

被引:0
|
作者
Xinyu Fu
Mark Svoboda
Zhenghong Tang
Zhijun Dai
Jianjun Wu
机构
[1] University of Nebraska–Lincoln,Community and Regional Planning Program
[2] University of Nebraska–Lincoln,National Drought Mitigation Center
[3] East China Normal University,State Key Lab of Estuarine and Coastal Research
[4] Beijing Normal University,Academy of Disaster Reduction and Emergency Management
来源
Natural Hazards | 2013年 / 69卷
关键词
Drought plan; State; Crisis management; Risk management; Resilience;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Recent severe drought events across the nation have raised our concerns over society’s changing and increasing vulnerability to droughts. All levels of governments have taken actions to plan for the slow-onset, long-lasting and spatially extensive drought hazard. The progress of drought planning at the state level is especially impressive over the past decade due to the dramatic growth of drought plans. To date, almost all states have drought plans, but previous studies indicated these plans are still heavily relying on the reactive crisis management approach to deal with ongoing droughts rather than the proactive risk management approach toward building drought resilience. No study so far has empirically examined how well all of these state plans are and to what extent these plans incorporated risk management theory and practices on a national basis. Thus, this study develops a drought risk coding protocol to systematically assess the 44 latest state drought plans’ quality in risk management. An inventory of the state drought plans is also established to demonstrate their quality, content and characteristics. The results indicate that state drought plans typically address emergency responses well, while they are generally weak in establishing strong goals, mitigation and adaptation, public involvement, plan updates and implementation. Lastly, recommendations are provided for drought officials to develop, enhance or revise drought plans toward a risk management approach.
引用
收藏
页码:1607 / 1627
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An overview of US state drought plans: crisis or risk management?
    Fu, Xinyu
    Svoboda, Mark
    Tang, Zhenghong
    Dai, Zhijun
    Wu, Jianjun
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2013, 69 (03) : 1607 - 1627
  • [2] Do drought management plans reduce drought risk? A risk assessment model for a Mediterranean river basin
    Gomez Gomez, Carlos Mario
    Perez Blanco, Carlos Dionisio
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 76 : 42 - 48
  • [3] Drought management plans and water availability in agriculture: A risk assessment model for a Southern European basin
    Perez-Blanco, Carlos Dionisio
    Mario Gomez, Carlos
    WEATHER AND CLIMATE EXTREMES, 2014, 4 : 11 - 18
  • [4] Management of drought risk under global warming
    Qiang Zhang
    Lanying Han
    Jianying Jia
    Lingling Song
    Jinsong Wang
    Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2016, 125 : 187 - 196
  • [5] Management of drought risk under global warming
    Zhang, Qiang
    Han, Lanying
    Jia, Jianying
    Song, Lingling
    Wang, Jinsong
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY, 2016, 125 (1-2) : 187 - 196
  • [6] An overview of the methodologies and politics of crisis management
    Nica, Noris-Claudiu
    BUSINESS TRANSFORMATION THROUGH INNOVATION AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT: AN ACADEMIC PERSPECTIVE, VOLS 3 AND 4, 2010, : 1573 - 1580
  • [7] Crisis risk and risk management
    Stulz, Rene M.
    EUROPEAN FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 29 (05) : 1377 - 1400
  • [8] Analysis of the integrity of district crisis management plans in Poland
    Wisniewski, Michal
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2022, 67
  • [9] When Castro seized the Hilton: Risk and crisis management lessons from the past
    Paraskevas, Alexandros
    Quek, Mary
    TOURISM MANAGEMENT, 2019, 70 : 419 - 429
  • [10] Collaborative serious games for crisis management: an overview
    Di Loreto, Ines
    Mora, Simone
    Divitini, Monica
    2012 IEEE 21ST INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON ENABLING TECHNOLOGIES: INFRASTRUCTURE FOR COLLABORATIVE ENTERPRISES (WETICE), 2012, : 352 - 357