Optimal decisions and Pareto improvement for green supply chain considering reciprocity and cost-sharing contract

被引:0
作者
Man Yang
Xiao-min Gong
机构
[1] Shanghai University of Finance and Economics,School of Information Management and Engineering
来源
Environmental Science and Pollution Research | 2021年 / 28卷
关键词
Reciprocal preference; Green supply chain; Consumer’s environmental preference; Cost-sharing contract; Pareto improvement; Game theory;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
With the rapid development of green consumption demand, more and more consumers choose to purchase green products. Incorporating consumers’ environmental awareness into a green supply chain, this paper studies the decisions and coordination of the green supply chain under the retailer’s reciprocal preference. The decentralized models with and without reciprocity are constructed and analyzed with consideration of product green degree and pricing. Then, the cost-sharing joint commission contract is proposed to realize Pareto improvement. Finally, propositions and conclusions are verified by numerical simulation. The results indicate that improving consumers’ environmental awareness is favorable to the profit of the whole supply chain and environment. Besides, within the reasonable range of retailer’s reciprocal preference, higher value of the retailer’s reciprocal preference is conductive to the better realization of environmental protection and the improvement of the economic welfare of the whole society. The cost-sharing contract exerts a positive effect in improving the environmental and economic performance in the green supply chain (GSC). The paper provides a theoretical foundation for the design of cooperative contracts in the GSC, especially the GSC with retailer’s reciprocal preference.
引用
收藏
页码:29859 / 29874
页数:15
相关论文
共 91 条
[1]  
Aslani A(2019)Transshipment contract for coordination of a green dual-channel supply chain under channel disruption J Clean Prod 223 596-609
[2]  
Heydari J(2003)Behavioral game theory: plausible formal models that predict accurately Behav Brain Sci 26 157-158
[3]  
Camerer CF(1995)Anomalies: ultimatums, dictators and manners J Econ Perspect 9 209-219
[4]  
Camerer C(2008)Security patch management: share the burden or share the damage? Manag Sci 54 657-670
[5]  
Thaler RH(2009)Quality improvement incentives and product recall cost sharing contracts Manag Sci 55 1122-1138
[6]  
Cavusoglu H(2014)How does individual low-carbon consumption behavior occur? – An analysis based on attitude process Appl Energy 116 376-386
[7]  
Cavusoglu H(2018)A pricing/ordering model for a dyadic supply chain with buyback guarantee financing and fairness concerns Int J Prod Res 55 1-18
[8]  
Zhang J(2017)Selecting a remanufacturing quality strategy based on consumer preferences J Clean Prod 161 S0959652617304912-1607
[9]  
Chao GH(2016)Production optimization considering environmental performance and preference in the cap-and-trade system J Clean Prod 112 1600-590
[10]  
Iravani SMR(2017)Low-carbon supply policies and supply chain performance with carbon concerned demand Ann Oper Res 255 569-402