Assessing the Importance of Natural Behavior for Animal Welfare

被引:0
|
作者
M. B. M. Bracke
H. Hopster
机构
[1] Wageningen University and Research Centre,Animal Sciences Group, Division Animal Resources Development
来源
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics | 2006年 / 19卷
关键词
Animal welfare; assessment methodology; model; natural behavior;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The concept of natural behavior is a key element in current Dutch policy-making on animal welfare. It emphasizes that animals need positive experiences, in addition to minimized suffering. This paper interprets the concept of natural behavior in the context of the scientific framework for welfare assessment. Natural behavior may be defined as behavior that animals have a tendency to exhibit under natural conditions, because these behaviors are pleasurable and promote biological functioning. Animal welfare is the quality of life as perceived by the animal. Animals have evolved cognitive-emotional systems (“welfare needs”) to deal with a variable environment. Animals do not only have so-called physiological needs such as the need for food, water, and thermal comfort. They also need to exercise certain natural behaviors such as rooting or nest-building in pigs, and scratching or dust-bathing in poultry. All needs must be taken into account in order to assess overall welfare. The degree of need satisfaction and frustration can be assessed from scientific information about the intensity, duration, and incidence of (welfare) performance criteria such as measurements of behavior and/or (patho)physiology. Positive welfare value relates to how animals are inclined to behave under natural conditions, in preference tests, and in consumer-demand studies. Negative welfare value relates to stress, frustration, abnormal behavior, aggression, and reduced fitness. Examples are given to illustrate how the need to perform natural behaviors can be assessed following the general principles for welfare assessment, providing a first approximation of how different natural behaviors affect animal welfare.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 89
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Dilemmas for Natural Living Concepts of Zoo Animal Welfare
    Learmonth, Mark James
    ANIMALS, 2019, 9 (06):
  • [22] Farm animal welfare: assessing risks attributable to the prenatal environment
    Rutherford, K. M. D.
    Donald, R. D.
    Arnottt, G.
    Rooke, J. A.
    Dixon, L.
    Mehers, J. J. M.
    Turnbull, J.
    Lawrence, A. B.
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2012, 21 (03) : 419 - 429
  • [23] Farm Animals Are Long Away from Natural Behavior: Open Questions and Operative Consequences on Animal Welfare
    Cesarani, Alberto
    Pulina, Giuseppe
    ANIMALS, 2021, 11 (03): : 1 - 14
  • [24] Assessing Animal Welfare: Different Philosophies, Different Scientific Approaches
    Fraser, David
    ZOO BIOLOGY, 2009, 28 (06) : 507 - 518
  • [25] Freedom and Animal Welfare
    Browning, Heather
    Veit, Walter
    ANIMALS, 2021, 11 (04):
  • [26] Assessing citizens' views on the importance of animal welfare and other sustainability aspects in livestock farming using best-worst scaling
    Schuetz, Aurelia
    Sonntag, Winnie Isabel
    Christoph-Schulz, Inken
    Faletar, Ivica
    FRONTIERS IN ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2023, 4
  • [27] Animal Training, Environmental Enrichment, and Animal Welfare: A History of Behavior Analysis in Zoos
    Fernandez, Eduardo J.
    Martin, Allison L.
    JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGICAL AND BOTANICAL GARDENS, 2021, 2 (04): : 531 - 543
  • [28] Importance and Feasibility of Animal Welfare Measures from a Consumer Perspective in Germany
    Winkel C.
    Schukat S.
    Heise H.
    Food Ethics, 2020, 5 (1-2)
  • [29] Assessing attitudes toward farm animal welfare: A national survey of animal science faculty members
    Heleski, CR
    Mertig, AG
    Zanella, AJ
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2004, 82 (09) : 2806 - 2814
  • [30] Assessing animal welfare at the farm and group level: A United States perspective
    Mench, JA
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2003, 12 (04) : 493 - 503