Putting ‘political’ back in political trust: an IRT test of the unidimensionality and cross-national equivalence of political trust measures

被引：8
作者：
van der Meer T.W.G. [1 ]
Ouattara E. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Department of Political Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam
来源：
Quality & Quantity | 2019年 / 53卷 / 6期
关键词：
Comparative analysis; Item response theory; Measurement equivalence; Political trust; Rasch modelling; Trust in government;
D O I：
10.1007/s11135-019-00913-6
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Much research intro political trust—its causes, correlates and trends—builds on the twin assumptions that trust in a wide range of political institutions is ultimately an expression of (1) a singular and (2) a cross-nationally equivalent underlying attitude. Yet, the widespread assumptions of unidimensionality and cross-national equivalence of political trust is at odds with the dominant conceptual understanding of political trust as a relational concept, driven by subjects, objects, and their interplay. This paper employs Rasch modelling as a direct, strict test of unidimensionality, equivalence and item hierarchy. We test the fit of the Rasch model on political trust items in seven widely used, cross-national surveys (World Values Survey, Afrobarometer, Arabbarometer, Asian Barometer, Eurobarometer, European Social Survey, and Latinobarometro), covering 161 national surveys in 119 countries across the globe. We find that the unidimensional specification of the Rasch model does not fit the standard political trust question batteries. Political trust is not cross-nationally equivalent; trust in specific political institutions is more than a mere indicator of an underlying attitude. This conclusion does not impede cross-national research into political trust; rather it illustrates the need for consistent robustness checks across a range of objects of political trust. Our findings open up new venues for substantive research questions on specific objects of political trust and their relationships. © 2019, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码：2983 / 3002
页数：19
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [1] Andre S., Does trust mean the same for migrants and natives? Testing measurement models of political trust with multi-group confirmatory factor analysis, Soc. Indic. Res., 115, pp. 963-982, (2014)
  • [2] Andrich D., Rasch models for measurement, (1988)
  • [3] Andrich D., Rasch rating-scale model, Handbook of item response theory, 1, (2016)
  • [4] Annoni P., Charron N., Measurement assessment in cross-country comparative analysis: Rasch modelling on a measure of institutional quality, Soc. Indic. Res., 141, pp. 31-60, (2019)
  • [5] Ariely G., Trusting the press and political trust: a conditional relationship, J. Elections Public Opin. Parties, 25, pp. 351-367, (2015)
  • [6] Bargsted M., Somma N.M., Castillo J.C., Political trust in Latin America, Handbook on political trust, pp. 217-395, (2017)
  • [7] Bauer P.C., Freitag M., Measuring trust, The oxford handbook of social and political trust, pp. 15-36, (2018)
  • [8] Bond T.G., Fox C.M., Applying the Rasch model: fundamental measurement in the human sciences, (2007)
  • [9] Breustedt W., Testing the measurement invariance of political trust across the globe. A multiple group confirmatory factor analysis, Methods Data Anal, 12, pp. 7-46, (2018)
  • [10] Byrne B.M., Shavelson R.J., Muthen B., Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: the issue of partial measurement invariance, Psychol. Bull., 105, pp. 456-466, (1989)
1234567