COVID-19 and the scientific publishing system: growth, open access and scientific fields

被引:0
作者
Gabriela F. Nane
Nicolas Robinson-Garcia
François van Schalkwyk
Daniel Torres-Salinas
机构
[1] Delft University of Technology,Delft Institute of Applied Mathematics (DIAM)
[2] University of Granada,EC3 Research Group, Information and Communication Studies Department
[3] Stellenbosch University,DST
来源
Scientometrics | 2023年 / 128卷
关键词
COVID-19; Scientific publications; Growth of science; Dimensions; Open access;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We model the growth of scientific literature related to COVID-19 and forecast the expected growth from 1 June 2021. Considering the significant scientific and financial efforts made by the research community to find solutions to end the COVID-19 pandemic, an unprecedented volume of scientific outputs is being produced. This questions the capacity of scientists, politicians and citizens to maintain infrastructure, digest content and take scientifically informed decisions. A crucial aspect is to make predictions to prepare for such a large corpus of scientific literature. Here we base our predictions on the Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) and exponential smoothing models using the Dimensions database. This source has the particularity of including in the metadata information on the date in which papers were indexed. We present global predictions, plus predictions in three specific settings: by type of access (Open Access), by domain-specific repository (SSRN and MedRxiv) and by several research fields. We conclude by discussing our findings.
引用
收藏
页码:345 / 362
页数:17
相关论文
共 93 条
[11]  
Wagner CS(1992)Classification of growth models based on growth rates and its applications Scientometrics 1 618-2701
[12]  
Callaway E(2021)The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of COVID-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape PLoS Biology 582 173-1067
[13]  
Chiarelli A(2020)The relationship between bioRxiv preprints, citations and altmetrics Quantitative Science Studies 125 2695-22
[14]  
Johnson R(2020)The pandemic mixed up what scientists study—and some won’t go back Nature 124 2687-1091
[15]  
Pinfield S(2020)Covid-19 pandemic and the unprecedented mobilisation of scholarly efforts prompted by a health crisis: Scientometric comparisons across SARS, MERS and 2019-nCoV literature Scientometrics 1 1056-694
[16]  
Richens E(2020)Preliminary analysis of COVID-19 academic information patterns: A call for open science in the times of closed borders Scientometrics 27 1-70
[17]  
Colavizza G(2020)Pandemic publishing: Medical journals strongly speed up their publication process for COVID-19 Quantitative Science Studies 1 1068-669
[18]  
Costas R(2021)No time for that now! Qualitative changes in manuscript peer review during the Covid-19 pandemic Research Evaluation 87 687-63
[19]  
Traag VA(2008)Automatic time series forecasting: The forecast package for R Journal of Statistical Software 34 68-822
[20]  
van Eck NJ(2020)NIH grapples with rush to claim billions in pandemic research funds Science 4 666-1551