Intelligent Tutoring for Surgical Decision Making: a Planning-Based Approach

被引:0
作者
Narumol Vannaprathip
Peter Haddawy
Holger Schultheis
Siriwan Suebnukarn
机构
[1] Mahidol University,Faculty of Information and Communication Technology
[2] University of Bremen,Bremen Spatial Cognition Center
[3] University of Bremen,Institute for Artificial Intelligence
[4] Thammasat University,Faculty of Dentistry
来源
International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education | 2022年 / 32卷
关键词
Surgical decision making; Endodontics; Situation awareness; Intelligent tutoring system; AI planning; Knowledge representation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Virtual reality simulation has had a significant impact on training of psychomotor surgical skills, yet there is still a lack of work on its use to teach surgical decision making. This is particularly noteworthy given the recognized importance of decision making in achieving positive surgical outcomes. With the objective of filling this gap, we have developed a system for teaching surgical decision making in the field of endodontics, by integrating a virtual reality simulation environment with a conversational intelligent tutor. This work presents SDMentor (Surgical Decision-making Mentor) – the first intelligent tutoring system for teaching surgical decision making. In this paper we focus on presenting the intelligent tutoring component of the training system. The design of the system and the teaching approaches are driven by information gained from an observational study of clinical teaching sessions. The tutoring system represents surgical actions and the procedure using a variant of the planning domain definition language (PDDL). Tutorial interaction places emphasis on teaching the rationale for decisions, as well as aspects of situation awareness. We evaluated the quality of the tutorial content by comparing it with tutorial feedback from ten experienced human tutors. We had three expert dental instructors rate the appropriateness of the tutorial feedback given by the human tutors as well as SDMentor over 20 scenarios. Bayesian analysis showed that tutoring interventions of SDMentor were significantly better than interventions by human tutors. To determine whether the expert scores may have been influenced by raters’ knowledge of whether interventions came from human tutors or SDMentor, we carried out a type of Turing test. Results show that the expert raters were able to correctly guess which interventions came from SDMentor only 15% of the time, compared to a random baseline accuracy of 9%.
引用
收藏
页码:350 / 381
页数:31
相关论文
共 134 条
  • [1] Andersen DK(2012)How can educators use simulation applications to teach and assess surgical judgment? Academic Medicine 87 934-941
  • [2] Badash I(2016)Innovations in surgery simulation: A review of past, current and future techniques Annals of Translational Medicine 4 453-19
  • [3] Burtt K(2012)An intelligent simulator for telerobotics training IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 5 11-249
  • [4] Solorzano CA(2013)Effective teaching and feedback strategies in the OR and beyond Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery 26 244-278
  • [5] Carey JN(1995)Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 4 253-69
  • [6] Belghith K(2016)Thinking like an expert: Surgical decision making as a cyclical process of being aware The American Journal of Surgery 211 64-27
  • [7] Nkambou R(2004)Approaches for creating computer-interpretable guidelines that facilitate decision support Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 31 1-64
  • [8] Kabanza F(1995)Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems Human Factors 37 32-89
  • [9] Hartman L(2007)Teaching surgeons about non-technical skills The Surgeon 5 86-140
  • [10] Champagne BJ(1997)Plan recognition and evaluation for on-line critiquing User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 7 107-51