Rethinking the role and impact of health information technology: informatics as an interventional discipline

被引:0
作者
Philip R. O. Payne
Yves Lussier
Randi E. Foraker
Peter J. Embi
机构
[1] The Ohio State University,College of Medicine Department of Biomedical Informatics
[2] University of Arizona,College of Medicine, Center for Biostatistics and Biomedical Informatics
[3] The Ohio State University,College of Public Health, Division of Epidemiology
来源
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making | / 16卷
关键词
Biomedical research; Informatics; Research design;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Recent advances in the adoption and use of health information technology (HIT) have had a dramatic impact on the practice of medicine. In many environments, this has led to the ability to achieve new efficiencies and levels of safety. In others, the impact has been less positive, and is associated with both: 1) workflow and user experience dissatisfaction; and 2) perceptions of missed opportunities relative to the use of computational tools to enable data-driven and precise clinical decision making. Simultaneously, the “pipeline” through which new diagnostic tools and therapeutic agents are being developed and brought to the point-of-care or population health is challenged in terms of both cost and timeliness. Given the confluence of these trends, it can be argued that now is the time to consider new ways in which HIT can be used to deliver health and wellness interventions comparable to traditional approaches (e.g., drugs, devices, diagnostics, and behavioral modifications). Doing so could serve to fulfill the promise of what has been recently promoted as “precision medicine” in a rapid and cost-effective manner. However, it will also require the health and life sciences community to embrace new modes of using HIT, wherein the use of technology becomes a primary intervention as opposed to enabler of more conventional approaches, a model that we refer to in this commentary as “interventional informatics”. Such a paradigm requires attention to critical issues, including: 1) the nature of the relationships between HIT vendors and healthcare innovators; 2) the formation and function of multidisciplinary teams consisting of technologists, informaticians, and clinical or scientific subject matter experts; and 3) the optimal design and execution of clinical studies that focus on HIT as the intervention of interest. Ultimately, the goal of an “interventional informatics” approach can and should be to substantially improve human health and wellness through the use of data-driven interventions at the point of care of broader population levels. Achieving a vision of “interventional informatics” will requires us to re-think how we study HIT tools in order to generate the necessary evidence-base that can support and justify their use as a primary means of improving the human condition.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
Jones SS(2014)Health information technology: an updated systematic review with a focus on meaningful use Ann Intern Med 160 48-54
[2]  
Rudin RS(2014)Clinical benefits of electronic health record use: national findings Health Serv Res 49 392-404
[3]  
Perry T(2015)Exceptional opportunities in medical science: a view from the National Institutes of Health JAMA 313 131-2
[4]  
Shekelle PG(2015)A new initiative on precision medicine N Engl J Med 372 793-5
[5]  
King J(2013)Evidence generating medicine: redefining the research-practice relationship to complete the evidence cycle Med Care 51 S87-S91
[6]  
Patel V(2003)Ten commandments for effective clinical decision support: making the practice of evidence-based medicine a reality J Am Med Inform Assoc 10 523-30
[7]  
Jamoom EW(2005)Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review JAMA 293 1223-38
[8]  
Furukawa MF(2014)Integrating pharmacogenetic information and clinical decision support into the electronic health record J Am Med Inform Assoc 21 522-8
[9]  
Collins FS(2005)Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success BMJ 330 765-2
[10]  
Collins FS(2012)Escaping the EHR trap—the future of health IT N Engl J Med 366 2240-22