Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept Compensation for Changes in Urban Water Customer Service Standards

被引:0
作者
Darla Hatton MacDonald
Mark D. Morrison
Mary B. Barnes
机构
[1] CSIRO,Sustainable Ecosystems
[2] Charles Sturt University,School of Business
[3] CSIRO,Mathematics, Informatics and Statistics
来源
Water Resources Management | 2010年 / 24卷
关键词
Choice modelling; Price of water; Urban water; Willingness to accept compensation; Willingness to pay;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this paper, we explore the use of choice modelling for obtaining implicit prices for attributes associated with changes in the reliability of household water services. While not often estimated in practice, the collection of information about willingness to accept compensation is relevant for utilities as customers often have implicit or explicit property rights for particular levels of customer service. Given ageing infrastructure in many cities, maintaining customer service standards requires large capital expenditures. It may be more economically efficient to allow standards to decline in some areas and compensate consumers. Therefore it is useful to understand the value of attributes of water service provision using willingness to accept and how this differs from willingness to pay. We therefore estimate both willingness to accept and willingness to pay measures, and find that respondents value a larger range of attributes using the willingness to accept approach.
引用
收藏
页码:3145 / 3158
页数:13
相关论文
共 68 条
  • [1] Bateman I(1997)A test of the theory of reference-dependent preferences Q J Econ 112 479-505
  • [2] Munro A(1979)Measuring values of extramarket goods: are direct measures biased? Am J Agric Econ 61 926-930
  • [3] Rhodes B(1991)Estimability in the multinomial probit model Transp Res B 25B 1-12
  • [4] Starmer C(1998)Environmental quality preference and benefit estimation in multinomial probit models: a simulation approach Am J Agric Econ 80 512-520
  • [5] Sugden R(1996)Predicting underground pipeline failure Water 23 9-10
  • [6] Bishop R(2003)A joint framework for analysis of agri-environmental payment programs Am J Agric Econ 85 976-987
  • [7] Heberlein T(2008)Evaluating consumers’ willingness to pay for improved potable water quality and quantity Water Resour Manage 22 1825-1834
  • [8] Bunch D(2003)Using stated preference discrete choice modelling to inform health care decision-making: a pilot study of breast screening participation Appl Econ 35 1073-1085
  • [9] Chen H(2000)Customers’ choice among retail energy suppliers: the willingness-to-pay for service attributes Energy J 21 1-28
  • [10] Cosslett S(1991)Willingness to pay and willingness to accept: how much can they differ? Am Econ Rev 81 635-647