Robotic distal pancreatectomy with selective closure of pancreatic duct: surgical outcomes

被引:0
作者
Luca Moraldi
Benedetta Pesi
Lapo Bencini
Marco Farsi
Mario Annecchiarico
Andrea Coratti
机构
[1] Careggi University Hospital,Division of Oncological and Robotic General Surgery
来源
Updates in Surgery | 2019年 / 71卷
关键词
Robotic surgery; Distal pancreatectomy; Wirsung closure; Surgical outcomes;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Pancreatic fistula is the main post-operative complication of distal pancreatectomy associated with other further complications, such as intra-abdominal abscesses, wound infection, sepsis, electrolyte imbalance, malabsorption and hemorrhage. Surgeons have tried various techniques to close the stump of the remaining pancreas, but the controversy regarding the impact of stapler closure and suture closure of the pancreatic stump is far from resolved. In this study, we reported our technique and results of robotic assisted distal pancreatectomy with ultrasound identification and consequent selective closure of pancreatic duct. Twenty-one patients underwent consecutive robotic-assisted distal pancreatectomy were included in our study. We describe our technique and analyzed the operative and peri-operative data including mean operative time, intra-operative bleeding, blood transfusions necessity, conversion rate, mortality and morbidity rate, pancreatic fistula rate and grade, time of refeeding and canalization, length of hospital stay and readmission. Median operative time was 260 min. No conversion occurred. Estimated blood loss was 100 mL (range 50–200). No blood transfusions were performed. Mortality rate was 0%. One (5%) patient had a major complication, while 9 (43%) patients had minor complications (grade I). Three (14%) patients developed pancreatic fistula (grade B), while two (10%) patients had a biochemical leak. No late pancreatic fistula and re-operation occurred. The refeeding was started at second day (range 1^–6^) and the median canalization time was 4 days (range 2–7). The median hospital stay was 6 days (range 3–25) with a readmission rate of 0%. Robotic distal pancreatectomy can be considered safe and feasible. Our technique is easily reproducible, with good surgical results.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 150
页数:5
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] DeOliveira ML(2006)Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery: a novel grading system applied to 633 patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy Ann Surg 244 931-937
  • [2] Winter JM(2002)Pancreatic cancer Curr Probl Cancer 26 176-275
  • [3] Schafer M(2005)Systematic review and meta-analysis of technique for closure of the pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatectomy Br J Surg 92 539-546
  • [4] Yeo TP(2004)Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey Ann Surg 240 205-213
  • [5] Hruban RH(2017)The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after Surgery 161 584-591
  • [6] Leach SD(2003)Distal pancreatectomy: is staple closure beneficial? ANZ J Surg 73 922-925
  • [7] Knaebel HP(2007)Distal pancreatectomy: risk factors for surgical failure in 302 consecutive cases Ann Surg 245 573-582
  • [8] Diener MK(1999)Prospective randomised pilot study of management of the pancreatic stump following distal resection HPB 1 203-207
  • [9] Wente MN(2011)Efficacy of stapler versus hand-sewn closure after distal pancreatectomy (DISPACT): a randomised, controlled multicentre trial Lancet 30 1514-1522
  • [10] Dindo D(1979)Simplified distal pancreatectomy with the Auto Suture stapler: preliminary clinical observations Surgery 85 166-170