Participatory tools for coastal zone management: Use of stakeholder analysis and social mapping in Australia

被引：0

作者：

Rockloff S.F. ^{[1
]}

Lockie S. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Centre for Social Science Research, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton

来源：

Journal of Coastal Conservation | 2004年 / 10卷 / 1-2期

关键词：

Environmental conflict; Great Barrier Reef; Planning; Queensland; Social analysis; Socio-cultural;

D O I：

10.1652/1400-0350(2004)010[0081:PTFCZM]2.0.CO;2

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

This paper presents research currently being conducted in Central Queensland, Australia to understand conflicts between coastal zone resource users and the associated sociocultural and political issues surrounding coastal zone management. Conflict occurs between stakeholders in the coastal zone over values, conservation and development trade-offs, access, and resource use rights. Decisions are currently made within a multi-stakeholder framework where there is limited understanding among stakeholders of each groups values and aspirations, and few mechanisms for negotiation, or to ensure transparency of decisions and feedback on consultation. This paper reports on the contribution of stakeholder analysis and social mapping to conflict management and findings from their application. As it is applied here, stakeholder analysis and social mapping have been successful participatory tools used to document and feed back the values, interests, attitudes and aspirations of stakeholders. Understanding stakeholder conflict is essential in progressing a whole catchment approach to decision-making that secures the cooperation of a diverse range of social groups. © EUCC; Opulus Press Uppsala.

引用

页码：81 / 92

页数：11

共 19 条

[1] Bingham G., Resolving Environmental Disputes: A Decade of Experience, (1986)
[2] Cicin-Sain B., Knecht R.W., Integrated Coastal and Ocean Management: Concepts and Practices, (1998)
[3] Dale A.P., Lane M.B., Strategic perspectives analysis: A procedure for participatory and political social impact assessment, Soc. Nat. Resour., 7, pp. 253-267, (1994)
[4] De Lopes T.T., Stakeholder management for conservation projects: A case study of Ream National Park, Cambodia, Environ. Manage., 28, pp. 49-60, (2001)
[5] Dryzek J., Discursive Democracy, (1990)
[6] Elkington J., Cannibals With Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business, (1997)
[7] Heard C., The Good Oil, (2002)
[8] Jennings S.F., Lockie S., Democratisation and capacity building in coastal zone decision-making in Australia: The application of stakeholder analysis and social mapping, (2002)
[9] Jennings S.F., Moore S.A., The rhetoric behind regionalization in Australian natural resource management: Myth, reality and moving forward, J. Environ. Policy Plann., 2, pp. 177-191, (2000)
[10] Lockie S., Social Impact Assessment in Review: Setting the Agenda for Impact Assessment in the Twenty-First Century, Impact Assess. Project Appr., 19, pp. 277-287, (2001)

← 1 2 →