Reintervention Burden and Vessel Growth After Surgical Reimplantation of a Pulmonary Artery During Childhood

被引:0
作者
Stephan J. Wu
Tacy Downing
Christopher Mascio
Matthew J. Gillespie
Yoav Dori
Jonathan J. Rome
Andrew C. Glatz
机构
[1] Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania,Division of Cardiology, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia
[2] Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania,Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia
[3] Nicklaus Children’s Hospital,undefined
来源
Pediatric Cardiology | 2018年 / 39卷
关键词
Isolated pulmonary artery; Pulmonary artery reimplantation; Reintervention;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Children requiring reimplantation of a branch pulmonary artery (PA) are at risk for postoperative stenosis and impaired growth of the reimplanted PA. Outcomes and risk factors for reintervention and impaired growth are incompletely described. We reviewed data on patients who underwent reimplantation of a branch PA between 1/1/99 and 5/1/15 at a single center. The primary outcome was reintervention to treat postoperative stenosis. The secondary outcome was “catch-up” growth (faster diameter growth of the affected PA compared with the unaffected PA from the preoperative to follow-up measurements.). Twenty-six patients were identified with a total follow-up of 102.2 patient-years (median 2.5 years). Diagnoses included LPA sling (n = 12) and isolated PA of ductal origin with (n = 7) or without (n = 7) tetralogy of Fallot (ToF). All had primary repair of the anomalous PA. Seventeen (65%) had reintervention with median time to first reintervention of 69 (range 1–1005) days and median of 1.5 (range 1–6) reinterventions. 94% of reinterventions were transcatheter (53% balloon and 41% stent angioplasty). Patients with reintervention were younger (hazard ratio 0.75 per log-day, p = 0.02) and lower weight (hazard ratio 0.18 per log-kg, p = 0.02) at initial repair. Of the 18 with PA growth data, 8 (44%) had catch-up growth. There were no identified differences between those who did and did not demonstrate catch-up growth. Despite a practice of primary reimplantation and aggressive postoperative reintervention, these results suggest that changes in strategy are needed or that there are intrinsic patient factors that have more influence on longer-term reimplanted PA growth.
引用
收藏
页码:390 / 397
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Hoffman JIE(2002)The incidence of congenital heart disease J Am Coll Cardiol 39 1890-1900
[2]  
Hoffman JIE(2016)Surgical experience in the rehabilitation and reimplantation of disconnected pulmonary arteries and its effectiveness in restoring pulmonary haemodynamics and function Eur J Cardio-Thoracic Surg 50 304-310
[3]  
Kaplan S(2008)The prevalence and clinical impact of pulmonary artery sling on school-aged children: a large-scale screening study Pediatr Pulmonol 43 656-661
[4]  
Kaplan S(1995)The varied manifestation of pulmonary artery agenesis in adulthood Chest 108 670-676
[5]  
Al-Khaldi A(2012)Pulmonary artery sling: current results with cardiopulmonary bypass J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 143 144-151
[6]  
Tamimi O(2004)Ascending aortic origin of a branch pulmonary artery–surgical management and long-term outcome Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 26 762-766
[7]  
Sallam M(1983)Origin of the right pulmonary artery from the ascending aorta Monatsschr Kinderheilkd 131 47-49
[8]  
Yu JM(2016)Vascular rings Semin Pediatr Surg 25 165-175
[9]  
Liao CP(2004)Isolated unilateral absence of a pulmonary artery—a case report Acta Cardiol Sin 20 245-250
[10]  
Ge S(2010)Long-term outcome of surgically repaired unilateral anomalous pulmonary artery origin Pediatr Cardiol 31 944-951