Soil flushing of cresols contaminated soil: application of nonionic and ionic surfactants under different pH and concentrations

被引:0
作者
Saeid Gitipour
Khadijeh Narenjkar
Emad Sanati Farvash
Hossein Asghari
机构
[1] University of Tehran,Graduate Faculty of Environmant
来源
Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering | / 12卷
关键词
Contaminated soil; Cresols; SDS; Soil flushing; Surfactants; Triton X-100;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this study, the viability of soil flushing on the removal of cresols (meta-, ortho-, and para-cresols) from contaminated soil has been investigated. High production and distribution of cresols in the environment indicate their potential for a widespread exposure to humans. The presence of these compounds in soil could cause a significant threat to environment, as they are toxic and refractory in nature. Cresols are persistent chemicals which are classified by the United State Environmental Protection Agency (U.S.EPA) as Group C, possible human carcinogens. Soil flushing is one of the soil remediation technologies which could by applied for treatment of hydrocarbon contaminated soil. Flushing of the contaminated soil samples was carried out by using sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and Triton X-100 surfactant solutions at the concentrations of 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.3%, and 0.4% (W/W). Three acidic, neutral, and alkaline environments were utilized by adjusting pH of the washing solutions at 3, 7 and 12 to evaluate the effect of washing environment in removing cresols. The results of this research denote that the highest removal efficiencies of 79.6% and 83.51% were achieved for m-cresol and total o- and p-cresols, respectively, under the alkaline environment of pH12 at 0.4% (W/W) SDS concentration. Regarding performance of Triton X-100, the removal efficiencies of 80.26% and 80.14% for the above cresols were attained under similar conditions. Hence, illustrating the effectiveness of surfactants in soil flushing remediation of cresols contaminated soil.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 87 条
  • [1] Torabian A(2010)Removal of petroleum aromatic hydrocarbons by surfactant-modified natural Zeolite: the effect of surfactant Clean - Soil Air Water 38 77-83
  • [2] Kazemian H(2012)Evaluation of oil removal efficiency and enzymatic activity in some fungal strains for bioremediation of petroleum-polluted soils Journal of Environmental Health Sciences & Engineering 9 26-1277
  • [3] Seifi L(2012)Enhanced flushing of polychlorinated biphenyls contaminated sands using surfactant foam: Effect of partition coefficient and sweep efficiency J Environ Sci 24 1270-132
  • [4] Nabi Bidhendi G(2013)Soil remediation using soil washing followed by Fenton oxidation Chem Eng J 220 125-619
  • [5] Azimi AK(2014)Effect of bioaugmentation to enhance phytoremediation for removal of phenanthrene and pyrene from soil with Sorghum and Onobrychis sativa Journal of Environmental Health Sciences & Engineering 12 24-839
  • [6] Ghadiri SK(2013)Surfactant flushing remediation of toluene contaminated soil: Optimization with response surface methodology and surfactant recovery by selective oxidation with sulfate radicals Sep Purif Technol 118 612-27
  • [7] Mohsenzadeh F(2005)Joint chemical flushing of soils contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons Environ Int 31 835-4675
  • [8] Chehregani Rad A(2010)The use of soil-flushing to remediate metal contamination in a smelting slag dumping area: Column and pilot-scale experiments Eng Geol 115 16-4280
  • [9] Akbari M(2002)Influence of Rhamnolipids and Triton X-100 on the desorption of pesticides from soils Environ Sci Technol 36 4669-1358
  • [10] Wang H(2006)Enhanced soil washing of phenanthrene by mixed solutions of TX100 and SDBS Environ Sci Technol 40 4274-389