Angiotensin II receptor blocker and long-acting calcium channel blocker combination therapy decreases urinary albumin excretion while maintaining glomerular filtration rate

被引:0
|
作者
Naoki Nakagawa
Takayuki Fujino
Maki Kabara
Motoki Matsuki
Junko Chinda
Kenjiro Kikuchi
Naoyuki Hasebe
机构
[1] Nephrology,Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine
[2] Pulmonology and Neurology,Department of Cardiology
[3] Asahikawa Medical University,undefined
[4] Hokkaido Junkanki Hospital,undefined
来源
Hypertension Research | 2011年 / 34卷
关键词
combination therapy; controlled-release nifedipine; candesartan; estimated glomerular filtration rate; urinary albumin excretion;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Microalbuminuria is a recognized risk factor and predictor for cardiovascular events in patients with hypertension. We analyzed changes in hypotensive effect, urinary albumin excretion (UAE) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in subjects with hypertension and microalbuminuria as a subanalysis of the results of the Nifedipine and Candesartan Combination (NICE-Combi) Study. A total of 86 subjects with essential hypertension with microalbuminuria (UAE <300 mg g−1 creatinine) were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to a combination therapy group (standard-dose candesartan at 8 mg per day plus controlled-release (CR) nifedipine 20 mg per day) (n=42) or an up-titrated monotherapy group (candesartan 12 mg per day) (n=44) for 8 weeks of continuous treatment after initially receiving standard-dose candesartan (8 mg per day) monotherapy for 8 weeks (initial treatment). After 8weeks, blood pressure (BP) was significantly reduced in both groups compared with at the end of initial treatment. UAE also showed a significant decrease in the combination therapy group, while there was no significant change of eGFR in either group. A significant positive correlation was seen between BP reduction and UAE after 8 weeks of double-blind treatment in both groups, whereas no significant association was found between ΔUAE and ΔeGFR in either group. These findings show that combination therapy with standard-dose candesartan and nifedipine CR is more effective than up-titrated candesartan monotherapy for reducing BP and improving UAE while maintaining eGFR, and strongly suggest that the combination of an angiotensin II receptor blocker and long-acting calcium channel blocker is beneficial in patients with hypertension and microalbuminuria.
引用
收藏
页码:1121 / 1126
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effect of an angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker, valsartan, on neurohumoral factors in patients with hypertension: Comparison with a long-acting calcium channel antagonist, amlodipine
    Ohbayashi, Y
    Tsutamoto, T
    Sakaguchi, T
    Tanaka, T
    Kanamori, T
    Yokohama, T
    Sichiri, G
    Hukai, D
    Okabayashi, T
    Ozawa, T
    Ishii, C
    Tsutsui, T
    Ohno, K
    Ohnishi, M
    Wada, A
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 2003, 42 : S71 - S74
  • [22] COMBINATION THERAPY WITH THE CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKER AZELNIDIPINE AND ANGIOTENSIN II RECEPTOR BLOCKERS DECREASES OXIDATIVE STRESS, RENAL AND ATHEROSCLETORIC MARKERS IN ESSENTIAL HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS
    Yamagishi, T.
    Omata, K.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2009, 27 : S130 - S130
  • [23] Combination of Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonist with Calcium Channel Blocker or Diuretic as Antihypertensive Therapy for Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease
    Ishimitsu, Toshihiko
    Ohno, Eri
    Nakano, Nobuyuki
    Furukata, Satoshi
    Akashiba, Akira
    Minami, Junichi
    Numabe, Atsushi
    Matsuoka, Hiroaki
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HYPERTENSION, 2011, 33 (06) : 366 - 372
  • [24] Combination of direct rennin inhibitor - aliskiren, angiotensin II receptor blocker - valsartan, and calcium channel blocker - amlodipine, in therapy of hypertensive patient with gout (case report)
    Dralova, O. V.
    Maksimov, M. L.
    RATIONAL PHARMACOTHERAPY IN CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 7 (04) : 468 - 472
  • [25] Comparison of the Effect of Combination Therapy with an Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker and Either a Low-Dose Diuretic or Calcium Channel Blocker on Cardiac Hypertrophy in Patients with Hypertension
    Okura, Takafumi
    Miyoshi, Ken-ichi
    Irita, Jun
    Enomoto, Daijiro
    Jotoku, Masanori
    Nagao, Tomoaki
    Watanabe, Kouki
    Matsuoka, Hiroshi
    Ashihara, Toshiaki
    Higaki, Jitsuo
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HYPERTENSION, 2013, 35 (08) : 563 - 569
  • [26] Angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB)-diuretic versus ARB-calcium channel blocker combination therapy for hypertension uncontrolled by ARB monotherapy
    Oshikawa, Jin
    Toya, Yoshiyuki
    Morita, Satoshi
    Taguri, Masataka
    Hanaoka, Kazushige
    Hasegawa, Toshio
    Kaizu, Kazo
    Kamata, Kouju
    Kobayashi, Shuzo
    Ohtake, Takayasu
    Sato, Takeo
    Yasuda, Gen
    Kimura, Kenjiro
    Umemura, Satoshi
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HYPERTENSION, 2014, 36 (04) : 244 - 250
  • [27] A long acting calcium channel blocker, azelnidipine, ameliorates angiotensin II induced renal damage in rats.
    Fujimoto, S
    Satoh, M
    Ozeki, M
    Kobayashi, S
    Haruna, Y
    Arakawa, S
    Horike, H
    Sasaki, T
    Kashihara, N
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2003, 14 : 609A - 610A
  • [28] Augmentation of antiproteinuric effect by combined therapy with angiotensin II receptor blocker plus calcium channel blocker in a hypertensive patient with IgA glomerulonephritis
    Kuriyama, S
    Tomonari, H
    Abe, A
    Kunieda, T
    Hosoya, T
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION, 2002, 16 (05) : 371 - 373
  • [29] Augmentation of antiproteinuric effect by combined therapy with angiotensin II receptor blocker plus calcium channel blocker in a hypertensive patient with IgA glomerulonephritis
    S Kuriyama
    H Tomonari
    A Abe
    T Kunieda
    T Hosoya
    Journal of Human Hypertension, 2002, 16 : 371 - 373
  • [30] COMBINED ANTIHYPERTENSIVE THERAPY WITH ANGIOTENSIN II RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST AND CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKER IN PATIENTS WITH METABOLIC SYNDROME
    Uzokov, Jamol
    Alyavi, Anis
    Hojiev, Sarvar
    Yaxshilikov, Davron
    Dadaev, Sarvar
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2016, 34 : E447 - E447