Otoacoutic Emission Testing in Preterm and Term Sick Newborns: A Comparative Analysis

被引:0
作者
Manjari Basu
Ajoy Kumar Khaowas
Saumitra Kumar
机构
[1] The West Bengal University of Health Sciences,Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine and JNM Hospital
[2] KPC Medical College and Hospital,Department of Otorhinolaryngology
[3] The West Bengal University of Health Sciences,Department of Otorhinolaryngology, College of Medicine and JNM Hospital
来源
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery | 2022年 / 74卷
关键词
Hearing impairment; Newborn; Otoacoustic Emission;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In newborns, both term and preterm, cochlear hearing loss is common due to different pathologies. Currently accepted methods for hearing screening in newborns are otoacoustic emission (OAE) and auditory brainstem responses. Among these two, OAE is quicker, economical and more accessible. In the present study we assessed OAEs in sick newborns, both term and preterm, having different pathological conditions. This descriptive study was conducted over 3 months in sick newborn care unit (SNCU) in a tertiary care hospital. All sick newborns admitted to SNCU in the study period were tested for otoacoustic emission. The results were subjected to the Chi square test (test of independence). Among 640 sick newborns, 184 were preterm; the rest being term newborns. Among the term sick newborns, 4.8% of those with birth asphyxia, 8.6% of those having septicaemia, 25% of those with hyperbilirubinemia needing exchange transfusion, 22.9% of those having meningitis and 33.3% of those with major congenital anomalies, had “refer” on OAE. Among preterm sick newborns, 30.8% of those with birth asphyxia, 32.5% of those having septicaemia, 75% of those with hyperbilirubinemia needing exchange transfusion, 41.7% of those having meningitis, 40% of those with major congenital anomalies and 8.7% of those with no co-morbidity had “refer” on OAE. Upon computing the p value of Chi square test performed on the results, the results were not significant (p = 0.85). Hence we didn’t find any statistically significant difference between term and preterm sick newborns on OAE. The incidence of “refer” result in OAE increases with co-morbidities in both term and preterm sick newborns, somewhat more in preterm newborns. But preterm sick newborns do not seem to have an increased incidence of hearing impairment.
引用
收藏
页码:252 / 254
页数:2
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Mohamed MT(2008)Auditory evaluation of high risk newborns by automated auditory brain stem response Iran J Pediatr 18 311-652
[2]  
Fatemeh E(2019)Early detection of neonatal hearing loss by otoacoustic emission and auditory Braintem response over 10 years of experience Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 127 109647-undefined
[3]  
Faranak E(2017)Consensus statement of the Indian Academy of Pediatrics on Newborn Hearing screening Indian Pediatr 54 647-undefined
[4]  
Escobar-Ipuz FA(2015)Hearing impairment and its risk factors by newborn screening in north-western India Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol 1 17-undefined
[5]  
Soria-Bretones C(1997)Auditory evoked potentials in children at neonatal risk for hypoacousis Rev Panam Salud 2 15-undefined
[6]  
Garcia-Jimenez MA(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[7]  
Cueto EM(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[8]  
Torres Aranda AM(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[9]  
Sotos JM(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[10]  
Paul A(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined