Ammonium sorption and ammonia inhibition of nitrite-oxidizing bacteria explain contrasting soil N2O production

被引:0
作者
Rodney T. Venterea
Timothy J. Clough
Jeffrey A. Coulter
Florence Breuillin-Sessoms
Ping Wang
Michael J. Sadowsky
机构
[1] USDA-ARS,Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics
[2] Soil and Water Management Research Unit,undefined
[3] Dep. of Soil,undefined
[4] Water and Climate,undefined
[5] Univ. of Minnesota,undefined
[6] Faculty of Agriculture and Life Science,undefined
[7] Lincoln Univ.,undefined
[8] Univ. of Minnesota,undefined
[9] Biotechnology Institute,undefined
[10] College of Biological Sciences,undefined
[11] Univ. of Minnesota,undefined
来源
Scientific Reports | / 5卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Better understanding of process controls over nitrous oxide (N2O) production in urine-impacted ‘hot spots’ and fertilizer bands is needed to improve mitigation strategies and emission models. Following amendment with bovine (Bos taurus) urine (Bu) or urea (Ur), we measured inorganic N, pH, N2O and genes associated with nitrification in two soils (‘L’ and ‘W’) having similar texture, pH, C and C/N ratio. Solution-phase ammonia (slNH3) was also calculated accounting for non-linear ammonium (NH4+) sorption capacities (ASC). Soil W displayed greater nitrification rates and nitrate (NO3−) levels than soil L, but was more resistant to nitrite (NO2−) accumulation and produced two to ten times less N2O than soil L. Genes associated with NO2− oxidation (nxrA) increased substantially in soil W but remained static in soil L. Soil NO2− was strongly correlated with N2O production and cumulative (c-) slNH3 explained 87% of the variance in c-NO2−. Differences between soils were explained by greater slNH3 in soil L which inhibited NO2− oxidization leading to greater NO2− levels and N2O production. This is the first study to correlate the dynamics of soil slNH3, NO2−, N2O and nitrifier genes and the first to show how ASC can regulate NO2− levels and N2O production.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 128 条
  • [1] Del Grosso SJ(2009)Global scale DAYCENT model analysis of greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation strategies for cropped soils Global Planet. Change. 67 44-50
  • [2] Vogeler I(2013)Comparison of APSIM and DNDC simulations of nitrogen transformations and N Sci. Total Environ. 465 147-155
  • [3] Giltrap D(1993)O emissions Adv. Agron. 49 119-199
  • [4] Cichota R(1996)Nutrient cycling and soil fertility in the grazed pasture ecosystem J. Environ. Qual. 6 1366-1370
  • [5] Haynes RJ(1972)Influence of cattle wastes on nitrous oxide and methane fluxes in pasture land Plant Soil. 36 159-175
  • [6] Williams PH(1989)Consequences of banding nitrogen fertilizers in soil. i. Effects on nitrification Fert. Res. 18 201-212
  • [7] Flessa H(2010)Nitrogen transformations near urea in soil: effects of nitrification inhibition, nitrifier activity and liming J. Environ. Qual. 39 115-125
  • [8] Dorsch P(2013)Influence of urea fertilizer placement on nitrous oxide production from a silt loam soil J. Environ. Qual. 42 312-322
  • [9] Beese F(2013)Nitrogen placement and source effects on nitrous oxide emissions and yields of irrigated corn Soil Biol. Biochem. 66 229-238
  • [10] Konig H(2014)Nitrite intensity explains N management effects on N New Zealand J. Agri. Res. 57 136-147