The Evolution of Food Security Governance and Food Sovereignty Movement in China: An Analysis from the World Society Theory

被引:0
作者
Scott Y. Lin
机构
[1] National Chengchi University,
来源
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics | 2017年 / 30卷
关键词
Food sovereignty; Food security; World society theory; Civil society; China;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Originating in a 1983 Mexican Government Program, the term ‘food sovereignty’ was coined in 1996 by La Via Campesina—a global peasant network—to address concerns within the civil society for food security. Rather than to accept the neoliberal framework of mainstream food security definition and governance, the food sovereignty movement seeks to view food security as the right of peoples to define their own food and agriculture systems with limited corporation intervention. As a result, food production should be geared toward the domestic and local markets and not toward international trade that only benefits corporations. This food sovereignty movement was inducted into China in 2013 just as China’s agricultural systems were shifting toward a more corporate-centric structure that increasingly exploits the small-scale farmers. A question was hence raised: How have the global civil society networks influenced the Chinese civil society and promoted China’s local food sovereignty movement? Through the world society theory, the author has identified social forums, such as international conferences and social media channels, as an expedient means for interactions. However, as the Chinese government continues to develop a corporate-centric food security governance system and tighten its civil society space, the impacts of China’s food sovereignty movement remain unclear.
引用
收藏
页码:667 / 695
页数:28
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Butollo F(2012)Challenging the atomization of discontent: Patterns of migrant-worker protest in China during the series of strikes in 2010 Critical Asian Studies 44 419-440
  • [2] ten Brink T(2012)Tudi Gaizhi Buneng Diu Yuanze Bian Fangxiang [Reform of the land tenure should not abandon the principle or change the direction] Gaige Neican 4 137-156
  • [3] Chen X(1995)Non-governmental organizations and their influence on international society Journal of International Affairs 48 507-525
  • [4] Clark AM(2014)Food sovereignty: Forgotten genealogies and future regulatory challenges The Journal of Peasant Studies 41 959-978
  • [5] Edelman M(2003)Private environmental governance and international relations: Exploring the links Global Environmental Politics 3 72-87
  • [6] Falkner R(2007)World society, NGOs and environmental policy reform in Asia International Journal of Comparative Sociology 48 275-295
  • [7] Frank DJ(2014)Changing relations of production in Chinese agriculture from decollectivization to capitalism McGill Sociological Review 4 67-92
  • [8] Longhofer W(2012)Development and division: The effect of transnational linkages and local politics on LGBT activism in China Journal of Contemporary China 21 845-862
  • [9] Schofer E(2002)The globalization of environmental protection: The case of environmental impact assessment International Journal of Comparative Sociology 43 65-78
  • [10] Gürel B(2012)China’s ‘Developmental Outsourcing’: A critical examination of Chinese global ‘Land Grabs’ discourse The Journal of Peasant Studies 39 1-48