A Minimax Regret Analysis of Flood Risk Management Strategies Under Climate Change Uncertainty and Emerging Information

被引:0
作者
T. D. van der Pol
S. Gabbert
H.-P. Weikard
E. C. van Ierland
E. M. T. Hendrix
机构
[1] Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis,Climate and Regional Economics
[2] Wageningen University,Environmental Economics and Natural Resources Group
[3] E.T.S.I. Informática,Computer Architecture, Universidad de Málaga
[4] Campus de Teatinos,undefined
来源
Environmental and Resource Economics | 2017年 / 68卷
关键词
Minimax regret; Flood risk; Climate change; Adaptive management; Flexibility; Robust optimisation; Learning;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper studies the dynamic application of the minimax regret (MR) decision criterion to identify robust flood risk management strategies under climate change uncertainty and emerging information. An MR method is developed that uses multiple learning scenarios, for example about sea level rise or river peak flow development, to analyse effects of changes in information on optimal investment in flood protection. To illustrate the method, optimal dike height and floodplain development are studied in a conceptual model, and conventional and adaptive MR solutions are compared. A dynamic application of the MR decision criterion allows investments to be changed after new information on climate change impacts, which has an effect on today’s optimal investments. The results suggest that adaptive MR solutions are more robust than the solutions obtained from a conventional MR analysis of investments in flood protection. Moreover, adaptive MR analysis with multiple learning scenarios is more general and contains conventional MR analysis as a special case.
引用
收藏
页码:1087 / 1109
页数:22
相关论文
共 128 条
[1]  
Averbakh I(2000)Minmax regret solutions for minimax optimization problems with uncertainty Oper Res Lett 27 57-65
[2]  
Baker E(2005)Uncertainty and learning in a strategic environment: global climate change Resour Energy Econ 27 19-40
[3]  
Bellman R(1954)The theory of dynamic programming Bull Am Math Soc 60 503-515
[4]  
Brekelmans R(2012)Safe dike heights at minimal costs: the nonhomogeneous case Oper Res 60 1342-1355
[5]  
den Hertog D(2004)Integrated ecological, economic and social impact assessment of alternative flood control policies in the Netherlands Ecol Econ 50 1-21
[6]  
Roos K(2008)Classical decision rules and adaptation to climate change Aust J Agr Resour Econ 52 487-504
[7]  
Eijgenraam C(2003)Anticipating catastrophes through extreme value modelling J Roy Stat Soc C Appl Stat 52 405-416
[8]  
Brouwer R(2011)Effect of uncertainty in land use, damage models and inundation depth on flood damage estimates Nat Hazards 58 407-425
[9]  
van Ek R(2013)Valuing flexibilities in the design of urban water management systems Water Res 47 7162-7174
[10]  
Clarke H(2007)Assessing the robustness of adaptation decisions to climate change uncertainties: a case study on water resources management in the East of England Global Environ Change 17 59-72