Florbetaben for PET Imaging of Beta-Amyloid Plaques in the Brain

被引:25
作者
Richards D. [1 ]
Sabbagh M.N. [1 ]
机构
[1] The Cleo Roberts Center for Clinical Research, Banner Sun Health Research Institute, 10515 West Santa Fe Drive, Sun City, 85351, AZ
关键词
Alzheimer’s disease; Amyloid imaging; Biomarkers; Florbetaben;
D O I
10.1007/s40120-014-0022-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a devastating neurodegenerative disorder affecting the elderly. Current clinical diagnostic tools are often ineffective in accurately diagnosing AD. However, new advances in diagnostic imaging, particularly positron emission tomography (PET) amyloid imaging, have shown increased sensitivity and specificity, as well as high inter-reader agreement. The most commonly studied tracer, PiB-C11, has shown high affinity binding to amyloid, but is limited in its use outside of research due to its short half-life. Instead, development of other PET ligands with increased half-life, such as fluorine-18-labeled (18F) tracers, allows for more widespread use of PET in clinical settings. In particular, recent phase II and III trials of 18F-florbetaben have demonstrated the high accuracy of this PET tracer in identifying amyloid accumulation. This paper will examine the techniques of amyloid imaging, focusing particularly on the recently approved 18F-florbetaben. © 2014, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 88
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Cummings J.L., Alzheimer’s disease, N Engl J Med, 351, pp. 56-67, (2004)
[2]  
Hansen R.A., Gartlehner G., Webb A.P., Morgan L.C., Moore C.G., Jonas D.E., Efficacy and safety of donepezil, galantamine, and rivastigmine for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Clin Interv Aging, 3, pp. 211-225, (2008)
[3]  
Banarjee S., Wittenberg R., Clinical and cost effectiveness of services for early diagnosis and intervention in dementia, Int J Geriatr Psychiatry, 24, pp. 748-754, (2009)
[4]  
McKhann G.M., Knopman D.S., Chertkow H., Et al., The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease, Alzheimers Dement., 7, pp. 263-269, (2011)
[5]  
Gaugler J.E., Kane R.L., Johnston J.A., Sarsour K., Sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic accuracy in Alzheimer’s disease: a synthesis of existing evidence, Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen., 28, pp. 337-347, (2013)
[6]  
Nair A.K., Sabbagh M.N., Amyloid imaging, Geriatric neurology, (2014)
[7]  
Dubois B., Feldman H.H., Jacova C., Et al., Advancing research diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer’s disease: the IWG-2 criteria, Lancet Neurol, 13, pp. 614-629, (2014)
[8]  
Morinaga A., Ono K., Ikeda T., Et al., A comparison of the diagnostic sensitivity of MRI, CBF-SPECT, FDG-PET and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers for detecting Alzheimer’s Disease in a memory clinic, Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord, 30, pp. 285-292, (2010)
[9]  
Cure S., Abrams K., Belger M., Dell'agnello G., Happich M., Systematic literature review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy in Alzheimer’s Disease and other dementia using autopsy as standard of truth, J Alzheimers Dis, 42, pp. 169-182, (2014)
[10]  
Fleisher A.S., Drzezga A., Functional Imaging in Dementia, Geriatric neurology, (2014)