Evaluation of multivariate statistical analyses for monitoring and prediction of processes in an seawater reverse osmosis desalination plant

被引:0
|
作者
Srinivas Sahan Kolluri
Iman Janghorban Esfahani
Prithvi Sai Nadh Garikiparthy
ChangKyoo Yoo
机构
[1] Kyung Hee University,Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Center for Environmental Studies, College of Engineering
来源
关键词
MANOVA; PCA; PLS; Desalination Plant;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Our aim was to analyze, monitor, and predict the outcomes of processes in a full-scale seawater reverse osmosis (SWRO) desalination plant using multivariate statistical techniques. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was used to investigate the performance and efficiencies of two SWRO processes, namely, pore controllable fiber filter-reverse osmosis (PCF-SWRO) and sand filtration-ultra filtration-reverse osmosis (SF-UF-SWRO). Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to monitor the two SWRO processes. PCA monitoring revealed that the SF-UF-SWRO process could be analyzed reliably with a low number of outliers and disturbances. Partial least squares (PLS) analysis was then conducted to predict which of the seven input parameters of feed flow rate, PCF/SF-UF filtrate flow rate, temperature of feed water, turbidity feed, pH, reverse osmosis (RO)flow rate, and pressure had a significant effect on the outcome variables of permeate flow rate and concentration. Root mean squared errors (RMSEs) of the PLS models for permeate flow rates were 31.5 and 28.6 for the PCF-SWRO process and SF-UF-SWRO process, respectively, while RMSEs of permeate concentrations were 350.44 and 289.4, respectively. These results indicate that the SF-UF-SWRO process can be modeled more accurately than the PCF-SWRO process, because the RMSE values of permeate flowrate and concentration obtained using a PLS regression model of the SF-UF-SWRO process were lower than those obtained for the PCF-SWRO process.
引用
收藏
页码:1486 / 1497
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] OPERATING A REVERSE OSMOSIS DESALINATION PLANT
    LOEB, S
    JOHNSON, JS
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING PROGRESS, 1967, 63 (01) : 90 - &
  • [42] Evaluation of Ceramics Adsorption Filter as a Pretreatment for Seawater Reverse-Osmosis Desalination
    Wang, Jingwei
    Sim, Lee Nuang
    Ho, Jia Shin
    Nakano, Keiko
    Kinoshita, Yusuke
    Sekiguchi, Kenichiro
    Chong, Tzyy Haur
    MEMBRANES, 2022, 12 (12)
  • [43] Toward a combined system of forward osmosis and reverse osmosis for seawater desalination
    Choi, Yong-Jun
    Choi, June-Seok
    Oh, Hyun-Je
    Lee, Sangho
    Yang, Dae Ryook
    Kim, Joon Ha
    DESALINATION, 2009, 247 (1-3) : 239 - 246
  • [44] Review of seawater natural organic matter fouling and reverse osmosis transport modeling for seawater reverse osmosis desalination
    Moonkhum, Monruedee
    Lee, Young Geun
    Lee, Yun Seok
    Kim, Joon Ha
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2010, 15 (1-3) : 92 - 107
  • [45] Achieving high water recovery at low pressure in reverse osmosis processes for seawater desalination
    Ahunbay, M. Goktug
    DESALINATION, 2019, 465 : 58 - 68
  • [46] Cost analysis of seawater desalination with reverse osmosis in Turkey
    Akgul, Demet
    Cakmakci, Mehmet
    Kayaalp, Necati
    Koyuncu, Ismail
    DESALINATION, 2008, 220 (1-3) : 123 - 131
  • [47] Development of reverse osmosis membrane seawater desalination in Japan
    Magara, Y
    Kawasaki, M
    Sekino, M
    Yamamura, H
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 41 (10-11) : 1 - 8
  • [48] Reverse osmosis seawater desalination: Qatar experience and vision
    Alnuaimi, Nasser
    Zaidi, Syed Javaid
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2020, 176 : 294 - 294
  • [49] Innovative seawater intake for reverse osmosis desalination plants
    Malfeito, Jorge J.
    Díaz-Caneja, José
    Jiménez, Alejandro
    International Journal of Nuclear Desalination, 2008, 3 (01) : 3 - 10
  • [50] Process simulation of modelled reverse osmosis for desalination of seawater
    Salahudeen, Nurudeen
    WATER PRACTICE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 17 (01) : 175 - 190