Independent Supported Housing Versus Institutionalised Residential Rehabilitation for Individuals with Severe Mental Illness: A Survey of Attitudes and Working Conditions Among Mental Healthcare Professionals

被引：0
作者：
Christine Adamus
Jovin Alpiger
Matthias Jäger
Dirk Richter
Sonja Mötteli
机构：
[1] Universitäre Psychiatrische Dienste Bern (UPD),Centre for Psychiatric Rehabilitation
[2] University of Bern,University Hospital of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
[3] ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences,School of Applied Psychology
[4] Psychiatrie Baselland,Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
[5] Psychiatric Hospital of the University of Zurich,Department of Health Professions
[6] University of Zurich,Centre for Psychiatric Rehabilitation
[7] Bern University of Applied Sciences,undefined
[8] Universitäre Psychiatrische Dienste Bern (UPD),undefined
来源：
Community Mental Health Journal | 2023年 / 59卷
关键词：
Independent Supported Housing; Housing rehabilitation; Residential care; Mental healthcare professionals; Attitudes; Severe mental illness;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Despite widespread support for Independent Supported Housing (ISH) interventions, psychiatric housing rehabilitation still commonly takes place in residential care facilities (RCFs). This study compares preferences, attitudes and working conditions of mental healthcare professionals (MHCPs) in ISH and RCFs using an online survey. The survey included setting preferences, stress and strain at work, recovery attitudes, stigmatisation, and factors experienced as particularly important or obstructive in housing rehabilitation. Data were analysed using quantitative and qualitative approaches. Of the 112 participating MHCPs, 37% worked in ISH and 63% in RCFs. Professionals’ education, work-related demands and influence at work were higher in ISH, stigmatising attitudes were higher in RCFs. MHCPs in both settings endorsed ISH. The support process was seen as particularly important whereas stigmatisation, regulatory and political requirements were seen as obstructive for successful housing rehabilitation. Results indicate that social inclusion of individuals with severe mental illness is seldom feasible without professional support.
引用
收藏
页码：531 / 539
页数：8
相关论文
共 114 条
[11]  
Visser E(2005)The Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire —a tool for the assessment and improvement of the psychosocial work environment Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health 54 1419-176
[12]  
Caro-Nienhuis A(2019)Mental health supported accommodation services in England and in Italy: A comparison Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 18 128-1261
[13]  
Sytema S(2018)Mental health supported accommodation services: A systematic review of mental health and psychosocial outcomes BMC Psychiatry 46 173-1017
[14]  
Wiersma D(1995)The eye of the beholder: Housing preferences of inpatients and their treatment teams Psychiatric Services 14 120-126
[15]  
Dehn LB(2014)Opening Minds Stigma Scale for Health Care Providers (OMS-HC): Examination of psychometric properties and responsiveness BMC Psychiatry 12 1251-220
[16]  
Beblo T(2022)Independent Supported Housing for non-homeless people with serious mental illness: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial Frontiers in Psychiatry 47 Doc05-449
[17]  
Richter D(2012)The new asylums in the community: Severely ill psychiatric patients living in psychiatric supported housing facilities. A Danish register-based study of prognostic factors, use of psychiatric services, and mortality Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 3 1011-279
[18]  
Wienberg G(2006)Measuring psychological stress and strain at work—Evaluation of the COPSOQ questionnaire in Germany GMS Psycho-Social-Medicine 59 123-823
[19]  
Kremer G(2008)Housing for persons with serious mental illness: Consumer and service provider preferences Psychiatric Services 330 209-31
[20]  
Steinhart I(2005)Reinstitutionalisation in mental health care: Comparison of data on service provision from six European countries BMJ 83 444-1439
12345678910