Inferior Right Ventricular Wall Thickness by Echocardiogram: A Novel Method of Assessing Hypertrophy in Neonates and Infants

被引:0
作者
Harrison D. Pravder
Emina Hodzic
Puneet Bhatla
Melissa Busovsky-McNeal
James C. Nielsen
机构
[1] NYU Langone Health,Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics
[2] Stony Brook University,Renaissance School of Medicine
来源
Pediatric Cardiology | 2020年 / 41卷
关键词
Right ventricular mass; Right ventricular hypertrophy; Echocardiography; Subxiphoid; Inferior wall; Pediatric cardiology;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
An established echocardiographic (echo) standard for assessing the newborn right ventricle (RV) for hypertrophy has not been thoroughly developed. This is partially due to the RV’s complex architecture, which makes quantification of RV mass by echo difficult. Here, we retrospectively evaluate the thickness of the inferior RV wall (iRVWT) by echo in neonates and infants with normal cardiopulmonary physiology. Inferior RVWT was defined at the medial portion of the inferior wall of the RV at the mid-ventricular level, collected from a subxiphoid, short axis view. iRVWT was indexed to body surface area (BSA) to the 0.5 power and normalized to iLVWT to explore the best normalization method. Ninety-eight neonates and 32 infants were included in the final analysis. Mean age for neonates and infants was 2 days and 59 days, respectively. Mean ± SD for neonate and infant end-diastole iRVWT was 2.17 ± 0.35 mm and 1.79 ± 0.28 mm, respectively. There was no residual relationship between the index iRVWT and BSA (r = 0.03, p = NS). In the infant cohort, the iRVWT was significantly lower and iLVWT was significantly higher compared to neonate, consistent with known physiologic changes of RV and LV mass. Thus, iRVWT may serve as a reliable and accurate proxy for RV mass and the parameter warrants further evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:1617 / 1622
页数:5
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
Davlouros PA(2006)The right ventricle in congenital heart disease Heart 92 i27-i38
[2]  
Niwa K(2009)Adult Congenital Heart Disease: importance of the Right Ventricle J Am Coll Cardiol 54 1903-1910
[3]  
Webb G(2007)Assessment of right ventricular size and function: echo versus magnetic resonance imaging Congenit Heart Dis 2 27-31
[4]  
Gatzoulis MA(2006)Electrocardiography in the diagnosis of right ventricular hypertrophy in children Pediatrics 118 1052-1055
[5]  
Warnes CA(2010)Right ventricular remodelling in pulmonary arterial hypertension with three-dimensional echocardiography: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging Eur J Echocardiogr 11 64-73
[6]  
Puchalski MD(2008)Accuracy of guideline recommendations for two-dimensional quantification of the right ventricle by echocardiography Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 24 691-698
[7]  
Williams RV(2010)Recommendations for quantification methods during the performance of a pediatric echocardiogram: a report from the Pediatric Measurements Writing Group of the American Society of Echocardiography Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease Council J Am Soc Echocardiogr 23 465-495
[8]  
Askovich B(1984)Comparison of M-mode echocardiographic measurement of right ventricular wall thickness obtained by the subcostal and parasternal approach in children Am J Cardiol 54 835-838
[9]  
Puchalski MD(2001)Estimation of right ventricular free-wall mass using two-dimensional echocardiography Pediatr Cardiol 22 306-314
[10]  
Lozier JS(2000)Normal values of M mode echocardiographic measurements of more than 2000 healthy infants and children in central Europe Heart 83 667-672