The effect of large-scale anti-contagion policies on the COVID-19 pandemic

被引:0
作者
Solomon Hsiang
Daniel Allen
Sébastien Annan-Phan
Kendon Bell
Ian Bolliger
Trinetta Chong
Hannah Druckenmiller
Luna Yue Huang
Andrew Hultgren
Emma Krasovich
Peiley Lau
Jaecheol Lee
Esther Rolf
Jeanette Tseng
Tiffany Wu
机构
[1] Goldman School of Public Policy,Global Policy Laboratory
[2] UC Berkeley,Agricultural & Resource Economics
[3] National Bureau of Economic Research,Energy & Resources Group
[4] Centre for Economic Policy Research,Electrical Engineering & Computer Science Department
[5] UC Berkeley,undefined
[6] Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research,undefined
[7] UC Berkeley,undefined
[8] UC Berkeley,undefined
来源
Nature | 2020年 / 584卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Governments around the world are responding to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic1, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), with unprecedented policies designed to slow the growth rate of infections. Many policies, such as closing schools and restricting populations to their homes, impose large and visible costs on society; however, their benefits cannot be directly observed and are currently understood only through process-based simulations2–4. Here we compile data on 1,700 local, regional and national non-pharmaceutical interventions that were deployed in the ongoing pandemic across localities in China, South Korea, Italy, Iran, France and the United States. We then apply reduced-form econometric methods, commonly used to measure the effect of policies on economic growth5,6, to empirically evaluate the effect that these anti-contagion policies have had on the growth rate of infections. In the absence of policy actions, we estimate that early infections of COVID-19 exhibit exponential growth rates of approximately 38% per day. We find that anti-contagion policies have significantly and substantially slowed this growth. Some policies have different effects on different populations, but we obtain consistent evidence that the policy packages that were deployed to reduce the rate of transmission achieved large, beneficial and measurable health outcomes. We estimate that across these 6 countries, interventions prevented or delayed on the order of 61 million confirmed cases, corresponding to averting approximately 495 million total infections. These findings may help to inform decisions regarding whether or when these policies should be deployed, intensified or lifted, and they can support policy-making in the more than 180 other countries in which COVID-19 has been reported7.
引用
收藏
页码:262 / 267
页数:5
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Wu F(2020)A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China Nature 579 265-269
  • [2] Chinazzi M(2020)The effect of travel restrictions on the spread of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak Science 368 395-400
  • [3] Kraemer MUG(2020)The effect of human mobility and control measures on the COVID-19 epidemic in China Science 368 493-497
  • [4] Romer CD(2010)The macroeconomic effects of tax changes: estimates based on a new measure of fiscal shocks Am. Econ. Rev. 100 763-801
  • [5] Romer DH(2020)Substantial undocumented infection facilitates the rapid dissemination of novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) Science 368 489-493
  • [6] Li R(2020)Estimation of the transmission risk of the 2019-nCoV and its implication for public health interventions J. Clin. Med. 9 462-7587
  • [7] Tang B(2007)Public health interventions and epidemic intensity during the 1918 influenza pandemic Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104 7582-141
  • [8] Hatchett RJ(2020)Estimating epidemic exponential growth rate and basic reproduction number Infect. Dis. Model. 5 129-97
  • [9] Mecher CE(2016)Mathematical models to characterize early epidemic growth: a review Phys. Life Rev. 18 66-239
  • [10] Lipsitch M(2015)Global non-linear effect of temperature on economic production Nature 527 235-510