Responses of energy balance, physiology, and production for transition dairy cows fed with a low-energy prepartum diet during hot season

被引:0
作者
Huawei Su
Yachun Wang
Qian Zhang
Fuwei Wang
Zhijun Cao
Muhammad Aziz Ur Rahman
Binghai Cao
Shengli Li
机构
[1] Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Institute of Animal Science
[2] China Agricultural University,State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology
[3] Purdue University,Department of Animal Sciences
来源
Tropical Animal Health and Production | 2013年 / 45卷
关键词
China; Dairy cow; Hot season; Energy balance; Physiology; Milk production;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Twenty multiparous Chinese Holstein dairy cows calving in hot summer (S group), were compared with 20 similar control cows calving in cool autumn (C group). Diets were the same for both groups; prepartum diets had relatively low energy density. Average temperature–humidity index was 76.5 and 53.0 in summer and autumn, respectively. S group cows had significantly higher rectal temperatures (39.6 vs. 39.0 °C) and respiration rates (79.0 vs. 31.3 breaths/min) than C group, and consumed less feed (prepartum 8.0 vs. 12.3 kg/day, postpartum 16.3 vs. 21.2 kg/day). Calculated energy balance (EB) was −7.98 vs. −5.15 Mcal/day for S group prepartum and postpartum, respectively. In contrast, EB was 1.36 vs. −2.03 Mcal/day for C group prepartum and postpartum, respectively. S group produced significantly less milk than C group by 15.4 % (5.2 kg/day) and 26.8 % (10.2 kg/d) for milk yield and energy-corrected milk, respectively. Percentages of milk fat (3.28 vs. 4.29 %), protein (3.08 vs. 3.33 %), and solids-not-fat (8.46 vs. 8.78 %) were significantly lower for S group. Milk urea nitrogen (19.54 vs. 13.31 mg/dL) was significantly higher in S group. Significantly lower feed efficiency was observed in S group (1.56 vs. 1.66). During the entire transition period, S group had significantly lower circulating glucose levels. S group had significantly higher levels of nonesterified fatty acids (NEFA) prepartum, but after 14 days in milk, NEFA was significantly lower. We conclude that increasing dietary energy density during transition period (especially prepartum) is necessary to minimize adverse effects of hot season.
引用
收藏
页码:1495 / 1503
页数:8
相关论文
共 187 条
  • [1] Agenäs S(2003)Effects of feeding intensity during the dry period. 1. Feed intake, body weight, and milk production Journal of Dairy Science 86 870-882
  • [2] Burstedt E(1999)Effects of heat load and photoperiod on milk yield and composition in three dairy herds in Israel Animal Science 69 37-47
  • [3] Holtenius K(2005)Effects of photoperiod during the dry period on prolactin, prolactin receptor, and milk production of dairy cows Journal of Dairy Science 88 121-127
  • [4] Aharoni Y(1980)Partitioning of nutrients during pregnancy and lactation: a review of mechanisms involving homeostasis and homeorhesis Journal of Dairy Science 63 1514-1529
  • [5] Brosh A(1988)Effect of bovine somatotropin on metabolism of lactating dairy cows: influence on rates of irreversible loss and oxidation of glucose and nonesterified fatty acids Journal of Nutrition 118 1031-1040
  • [6] Ezra E(2011)Postabsorptive carbohydrate adaptations to heat stress and monensin supplementation in lactating Holstein cows Journal of Dairy Science 94 5620-5633
  • [7] Auchtung T.L.(2002)The relationship of temperature-humidity index with milk production of dairy cows in a Mediterranean climate Animal Research 51 479-491
  • [8] Rius A.G.(2006)Major advances associated with environmental effects on dairy cattle Journal of Dairy Science 89 1244-1253
  • [9] Kendall P.E.(2008)Effects of short day photoperiod on prolactin signaling in dry cows: A common mechanism among tissues and environments Journal of Animal Science 86 10-14
  • [10] McFadden T.B.(2012)Effects of photoperiod on mammary gland development and lactation Journal of Animal Science 90 755-760