Bone Biomechanics and Bone Quality: Effects of Pharmaceutical Agents Used to Treat Osteoporosis

被引:7
作者
Burr D.B. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Dr., Indianapolis, 46202, IN
[2] Department of Biomedical Engineering, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN
来源
Clinical Reviews in Bone and Mineral Metabolism | 2016年 / 14卷 / 3期
关键词
Biomechanics; Bisphosphonates; Fragility; Osteoporosis; Quality;
D O I
10.1007/s12018-016-9217-1
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The biomechanical properties of bone define skeletal fragility. Surrogates such as bone density or biochemical markers are used to estimate the mechanical properties of bone because mechanical properties cannot be measured in a clinical environment. Within the set of bone’s mechanical properties, the material properties of the tissue itself are the defining feature of bone quality. Because they are the summation of all bone quality characteristics, bone’s material properties can define whether bone is fragile or healthy, even though other studies are required to determine the exact characteristics of microarchitecture, microdamage, and tissue physical properties that make the bone more or less fragile. For these reasons, measurement of the mechanical properties of bone is critical to assess bone health following drug treatments meant to ameliorate low bone mass, and are a common outcome measure in preclinical studies that assess the potential of these medications. This review describes the effects of existing anti-catabolic (bisphosphonates, SERMS, RANKL inhibitors) and anabolic (rhPTH (1-34) agents used to treat osteoporosis, and also several emerging potential therapies (cathepsin K inhibitors, anti-sclerostin antibody), on bone’s structural and material mechanical properties. © 2016, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 217
页数:20
相关论文
共 137 条
[1]  
Watts N.B., Geusens P., Barton I.P., Felsenberg D., Relationship between changes in BMD and nonvertebral fracture incidence associated with risedronate reduction in risk of nonvertebral fracture is not related to change in BMD, J Bone Miner Res, 20, pp. 2097-2104, (2005)
[2]  
Allen M.R., McNerny E.M.B., Organ J.M., Wallace J.M., True gold or pyrite: a review of reference point indentation for assessing bone mechanical properties in vivo, J Bone Miner Res, 30, pp. 1539-1550, (2015)
[3]  
Currey J.D., Bones, (2002)
[4]  
Currey J.D., Incompatible mechanical properties in compact bone, J Theor Biol, 231, pp. 569-580, (2004)
[5]  
Yao W., Cheng Z., Koester K.J., Ager J.W., Balooch M., Pham A., Chefo S., Busse C., Ritchie R.O., Lane N.E., The degree of bone mineralization is maintained with single intravenous bisphosphonates in aged estrogen-deficient rats and is a strong predictor of bone strength, Bone, 41, pp. 804-812, (2007)
[6]  
Burr D.B., Russell R.G.G., Special Issue: bisphosphonates, Bone, 49, pp. 1-145, (2011)
[7]  
Boyce R.W., Paddock C.L., Gleason J.R., Sletsema W.K., Eriksen E.F., The effects of risedronate on canine cancellous bone remodeling: three-dimensional kinetic reconstruction of the remodeling site, J Bone Miner Res, 10, pp. 211-221, (1995)
[8]  
Allen M.R., Erickson A.M., Wang X., Burr D.B., Martin R.B., Hazelwood S.J., Morphological assessment of basic multicellular unit resorption parameters in dogs shows additional mechanisms of bisphosphonate effects on bone, Calcif Tissue Int, 86, pp. 67-71, (2010)
[9]  
Matheny J.B., Slyfield C.R., Tkachenko E.V., Lin I., Ehlert K.M., Tomlinson R.E., Wilson D.L., Hernandez C.J., Anti-resorptive agents reduce the size of resorption cavities: a three-dimensional dynamic bone histomorphometry study, Bone, 57, pp. 277-283, (2013)
[10]  
Boivin G., Chavassieux P.M., Santora A.C., Yates J., Meunier P.J., Alendronate increases bone strength by increasing the mean degree of mineralization of bone tissue in osteoporotic women, Bone, 27, pp. 687-694, (2000)