Data-driven risk identification in phase III clinical trials using central statistical monitoring

被引:0
作者
Catherine Timmermans
David Venet
Tomasz Burzykowski
机构
[1] Université Catholique de Louvain,Institut de Statistique, Biostatistique et Sciences Actuarielles (ISBA)
[2] Université Libre de Bruxelles,Institut de Recherches Interdisciplinaires et de Développements en Intelligence Artificielle (IRIDIA)
[3] Hasselt University,Interuniversity Institute for Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics
[4] International Drug Development Institute,undefined
来源
International Journal of Clinical Oncology | 2016年 / 21卷
关键词
Clinical trials; Multicenter study; Risk management; Quality assurance;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Our interest lies in quality control for clinical trials, in the context of risk-based monitoring (RBM). We specifically study the use of central statistical monitoring (CSM) to support RBM. Under an RBM paradigm, we claim that CSM has a key role to play in identifying the “risks to the most critical data elements and processes” that will drive targeted oversight. In order to support this claim, we first see how to characterize the risks that may affect clinical trials. We then discuss how CSM can be understood as a tool for providing a set of data-driven key risk indicators (KRIs), which help to organize adaptive targeted monitoring. Several case studies are provided where issues in a clinical trial have been identified thanks to targeted investigation after the identification of a risk using CSM. Using CSM to build data-driven KRIs helps to identify different kinds of issues in clinical trials. This ability is directly linked with the exhaustiveness of the CSM approach and its flexibility in the definition of the risks that are searched for when identifying the KRIs. In practice, a CSM assessment of the clinical database seems essential to ensure data quality. The atypical data patterns found in some centers and variables are seen as KRIs under a RBM approach. Targeted monitoring or data management queries can be used to confirm whether the KRIs point to an actual issue or not.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 45
页数:7
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Duley L(2005)Commission directive 2005/28/EC Off J Eur Union L91 13-19
  • [2] Antman K(2008)Specific barriers to the conduct of randomized trials Clin Trials 5 40-48
  • [3] Arena J(2011)Hybrid approaches to clinical trial monitoring: practical alternatives to 100% source data verification Perspect Clin Res 2 100-104
  • [4] De S(2012)The value of source data verification in a cancer clinical trial PLoS One 7 e51623-264
  • [5] Tudur Smith C(2012)The potential for central monitoring techniques to replace on-site monitoring: findings from an international multi-centre clinical trial Clin Trials 9 257-349
  • [6] Stocken DD(2011)Monitoring the quality of conduct of clinical trials: a survey of current practices Clin Trials 8 342-55
  • [7] Dunn J(2008)Ensuring trial validity by data quality assurance and diversification of monitoring methods Clin Trials 5 49-173
  • [8] Bakobaki JM(2015)Data fraud in clinical trials Clin Investig (Lond) 5 161-713
  • [9] Rauchenberger M(2012)A statistical approach to central monitoring of data quality in clinical trials Clin Trials 9 705-5279
  • [10] Joffe N(2014)Linear mixed-effects models for central statistical monitoring of multicenter clinical trials Stat Med 33 5265-806