Fracture Toughness Testing of Dental Restoratives: a Critical Evaluation

被引:0
作者
Belli R. [1 ]
Zorzin J.I. [1 ]
Lohbauer U. [1 ]
机构
[1] Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Zahnklinik 1 – Zahnerhaltung und Parodontologie, Forschungslabor für dentale Biomaterialien, Glueckstraße 11, Erlangen
关键词
Dental restorative materials; Fracture toughness; Mechanical properties; Testing;
D O I
10.1007/s40496-018-0184-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose of Review: We intend by this short critical review to highlight important aspects regarding the mechanical testing of fracture toughness. The final aim is to increase the awareness to the test sensitivity, ultimately increasing the quality and reliability of reported testing results. Recent Findings: In a well-intended attempt to facilitate testing procedures or provide alternatives for testing material interfaces, authors are resorting to adaptation of testing methodologies without proper theoretical and experimental validation. The assumption of validity in such cases endangers the perpetration of testing strategies that are not safeguarded by sound theoretical bases. The use of improper statistical treatments based on extreme-value distributions further aggravates this scenario. Summary: We supply here some directions for authors concerning method selection, interpretation of data scatter, statistical treatment, and possibilities for test validation. © 2018, Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 168
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Qualifying indentation fracture toughness testing by ultrasonics
    Bergner, F
    Kohler, B
    NONDESTRUCTIVE CHARACTERIZATION OF MATERIALS VII, PTS 1 AND 2, 1996, 210-2 : 831 - 838
  • [32] Fracture toughness calculation using dynamic testing
    Perosanz, FJ
    Serrano, M
    Martínez, C
    Lapeña, J
    REVISTA DE METALURGIA, 1998, 34 (05) : 399 - 406
  • [33] Translaminar fracture toughness testing of composites: A review
    Laffan, M. J.
    Pinho, S. T.
    Robinson, P.
    McMillan, A. J.
    POLYMER TESTING, 2012, 31 (03) : 481 - 489
  • [34] Effect of autoclave postpolymerization treatments on the fracture toughness of autopolymerizing dental acrylic resins
    Durkan, Rukiye
    Gurbuz, Ayhan
    Yilmaz, Burak
    Ozel, M. Birol
    Bagis, Bora
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED BIOMATERIALS & FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS, 2012, 10 (01) : 37 - 42
  • [35] Fracture toughness testing of materials by the EF method
    G. A. Gogotsi
    Inorganic Materials, 2006, 42 : 567 - 572
  • [36] Critical evaluation of SEVNP-method to measure fracture toughness of ceramic thin plates
    Kuehl, Hannes
    Ruebling, Achim
    Schnee, Daniel
    OPEN CERAMICS, 2024, 17
  • [37] FRACTURE-TOUGHNESS BY SMALL PUNCH TESTING
    FOULDS, JR
    WOYTOWITZ, PJ
    PARNELL, TK
    JEWETT, CW
    JOURNAL OF TESTING AND EVALUATION, 1995, 23 (01) : 3 - 10
  • [38] Fracture toughness testing of materials by the EF method
    Gogotsi, G. A.
    INORGANIC MATERIALS, 2006, 42 (05) : 567 - 572
  • [39] Fracture toughness of esthetic dental coating systems by nanoindentation and FIB sectional analysis
    Pecnik, Christina Martina
    Courty, Diana
    Muff, Daniel
    Spolenak, Ralph
    JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS, 2015, 47 : 1 - 11
  • [40] EVALUATION OF FRACTURE TOUGHNESS CTOD TESTING AND ITS STANDARD TEST METHODS FOR SENB SPECIMENS
    Zhu, Xian-Kui
    McGaughy, Tom
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING CONFERENCE, 2018, VOL 6A, 2019,