Disentangling the relative effect of light pollution, impervious surfaces and intensive agriculture on bat activity with a national-scale monitoring program

被引:70
作者
Azam C. [1 ]
Le Viol I. [1 ]
Julien J.-F. [1 ]
Bas Y. [1 ]
Kerbiriou C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Center for Ecology and Conservation Science, UMR7204-MNHN-CNRS-UPMC, National Natural History Museum, 55 rue Buffon, Paris
关键词
Bats; Chiroptera; Land-use planning; Nightscape; Outdoor lighting; Urbanization;
D O I
10.1007/s10980-016-0417-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Context: Light pollution is a global change affecting a major proportion of global land surface. Although the impacts of Artificial Light At Night (ALAN) have been documented locally for many taxa, the extent of effect of ALAN at a landscape scale on biodiversity is unknown. Objectives: We characterized the landscape-scale impacts of ALAN on 4 insectivorous bat species Pipistrellus pipistrellus, Pipistrellus kuhlii, Eptesicus serotinus, Nyctalus leisleri, and compared the extent of their effects to other major land-use pressures. Methods: We used a French national-scale monitoring program recording bat activity among 2-km car transect surveys, and extracted landscape characteristics around transects with satellite and land cover layers. For each species, we performed multi-model averaging at 4 landscape scales (from 200 to 1000 m buffers around transects) to compare the relative effects of the average radiance, the proportion of impervious surface and the proportion of intensive agriculture. Results: For all species, ALAN had a stronger negative effect than impervious surface at the 4 landscape scales tested. This effect was weaker than the effect of intensive agriculture. The negative effect of ALAN was significant for P. pipistrellus, P. kuhlii and E. serotinus, but not for N. leisleri. The effect of impervious surface varied among species while intensive agriculture had a significant negative effect on the 4 species. Conclusion: Our results highlight the need to consider the impacts of ALAN on biodiversity in land-use planning and suggest that using only impervious surface as a proxy for urbanization may lead to underestimated impacts on biodiversity. © 2016, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
引用
收藏
页码:2471 / 2483
页数:12
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]  
Arthur L., Lemaire M., Les Chauves-souris de France Belgique Luxembourg et Suisse, BIOTOPE, (2009)
[2]  
Azam C., Kerbiriou C., Vernet A., Julien J.F., Bas Y., Plichard L., Maratrat J., Le Viol I., Is part-night lighting an effective measure to limit the impacts of artificial lighting on bats?, Global Change Biol, 21, pp. 4333-4341, (2015)
[3]  
Barton K., MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference, R package version 1.13, (2015)
[4]  
Bates A.J., Sadler J.P., Grundy D., Lowe N., Davis G., Baker D., Bridge M., Freestone R., Gardner D., Gibson C., Hemming R., Howarth S., Orridge S., Shaw M., Tams T., Young H., Garden and landscape-scale correlates of moths of differing conservation status: significant effects of urbanization and habitat diversity, PLoS ONE, 9, (2014)
[5]  
Bates D., Maechler M., Bolker B., Walker S., Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4, J Stat Softw, 67, pp. 1-48, (2015)
[6]  
Baugh K., Hsu F.-C., Elvidge C.D., Zhizhin M., Nighttime lights compositing using the VIIRS day-night band: preliminary results, Proc Asia-Pac Adv Netw, 35, pp. 70-86, (2013)
[7]  
Bennie J., Davies T.W., Cruse D., Inger R., Gaston K.J., Cascading effects of artificial light at night: resource-mediated control of herbivores in a grassland ecosystem, Philos Trans R Soc Lond B, 370, (2015)
[8]  
Blake D., Hutson A.M., Racey P.A., Rydell J., Speakman J.R., Use of lamplit roads by foraging bats in southern England, J Zool, 234, pp. 453-462, (1994)
[9]  
Boldogh S., Dobrosi D., Samu P., The effects of the illumination of buildings on house-dwelling bats and its conservation consequences, Acta Chiropterol, 9, pp. 527-534, (2007)
[10]  
Boughey K.L., Lake I.R., Haysom K.A., Dolman P.M., Effects of landscape-scale broadleaved woodland configuration and extent on roost location for six bat species across the UK, Biol Conserv, 144, pp. 2300-2310, (2011)