Risk management capability model for the development of medical device software

被引:0
|
作者
Fergal Mc Caffery
John Burton
Ita Richardson
机构
[1] Dundalk Institute of Technology and Lero,Lero, The Irish Software Engineering Research Centre
[2] Vitalograph Ltd,undefined
[3] University of Limerick,undefined
来源
Software Quality Journal | 2010年 / 18卷
关键词
Software risk management; Software quality; Software engineering; Software process improvement; Software reliability; Software design; Computing methodologies; Medical devices; United States Food and Drug Administration;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Failure of medical device (MD) software can have potentially catastrophic effects, leading to injury of patients or even death. Therefore, regulators penalise MD manufacturers who do not demonstrate that sufficient attention is devoted to the areas of hazard analysis and risk management (RM) throughout the software lifecycle. This paper has two main objectives. The first objective is to compare how thorough current MD regulations are with relation to the Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI®) in specifying what RM practices MD companies should adopt when developing software. The second objective is to present a Risk Management Capability Model (RMCM) for the MD software industry, which is geared towards improving software quality, safety and reliability. Our analysis indicates that 42 RM sub-practices would have to be performed in order to satisfy MD regulations and that only an additional 8 sub-practices would be required in order to satisfy all the CMMI® level 1 requirements. Additionally, MD companies satisfying the CMMI® goals of the RM process area by performing the CMMI® RM practices will not meet the requirements of the MD software RM regulations as an additional 20 MD-specific sub-practices have to be added to meet the objectives of RMCM.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 107
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] System Design Approach to Medical Device Development
    Wehde, Mark
    2020 6TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SYSTEMS ENGINEERING (IEEE ISSE 2020), 2020,
  • [42] A Systematic Approach to Quality Requirement Management in Medical Software
    Messer-Misak, Karin
    de Bruin, Jeroen S.
    Hanke, Sten
    DHEALTH 2020 - BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS FOR HEALTH AND CARE, 2020, 271 : 129 - 136
  • [43] Total Software Quality Management Model
    Soper, RJ
    Karacali, B
    Honeycutt, TL
    SOFTWARE QUALITY ENGINEERING, 1997, : 113 - 122
  • [44] QUALITY MANAGEMENT AS SUPPORTIVE SYSTEM FOR CORPORATE MANAGEMENT OF MEDICAL DEVICE ENTERPRISES
    Gschwandtner, Michael
    AKTUALNE PROBLEMY PODNIKOVEJ SFERY 2015, 2015, : 167 - 173
  • [45] Tangibility of Fuzzy Approach Risk Assessment in Distributed Software Development Projects
    Birant, Kokten Ulas
    Isik, Ali Hakan
    Batar, Mustafa
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS IN ENGINEERING PROBLEMS, 2020, 43 : 676 - 683
  • [46] EMPIRICAL EVALUATION OF CLASSIFIERS FOR SOFTWARE RISK MANAGEMENT
    Peng, Yi
    Kou, Gang
    Wang, Guoxun
    Wang, Honggang
    Ko, Franz I. S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2009, 8 (04) : 749 - 767
  • [47] A Probabilistic Software Risk Assessment and Estimation Model for Software Projects
    Kumar, Chandan
    Yadav, Dilip Kumar
    ELEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATION NETWORKS, ICCN 2015/INDIA ELEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA MINING AND WAREHOUSING, ICDMW 2015/NDIA ELEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, ICISP 2015, 2015, 54 : 353 - 361
  • [48] Risk management analysis in Scrum software projects
    Tavares, Breno Gontijo
    Sanches da Silva, Carlos Eduardo
    de Souza, Adler Diniz
    INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS IN OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2019, 26 (05) : 1884 - 1905
  • [49] Agile risk management using software agents
    Edzreena Edza Odzaly
    Des Greer
    Darryl Stewart
    Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 2018, 9 : 823 - 841
  • [50] Agile risk management using software agents
    Odzaly, Edzreena Edza
    Greer, Des
    Stewart, Darryl
    JOURNAL OF AMBIENT INTELLIGENCE AND HUMANIZED COMPUTING, 2018, 9 (03) : 823 - 841