Exploring University Students’ Preferences for Educational Robot Design by Means of a User-Centered Design Approach

被引:0
作者
Natalia Reich-Stiebert
Friederike Eyssel
Charlotte Hohnemann
机构
[1] Bielefeld University,Applied Social Psychology and Gender Research, CITEC
[2] Bielefeld University,Department of Psychology
来源
International Journal of Social Robotics | 2020年 / 12卷
关键词
Robot prototyping; User-centered design; Educational robots; User involvement;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
User-centered design approaches have become more prominent in various domains and have slowly been adopted in robotics research. Previous research on user-centered design highlights the beneficial effects of actively involving end users into the design process. Results further imply that end users have different notions about ideal robot design, placing special demands on social robots depending on the context and personal factors. In the present exploratory research, we applied a user-centered design method and investigated university students’ (N = 116) preferences regarding the design of educational robots. With regard to robot design, university students prefer a medium-sized machinelike robot with human characteristics and minimal facial features. Our results further suggest that a robot should primarily interact via speech and be able to display basic emotions, especially the positive ones. Additionally, from a university students’ perspective, an ideal educational robot should display behavior that is marked by conscientiousness, agreeableness, and openness. We discuss implications of our results for educational robot design, and highlight the gains of user involvement in design decisions for human–robot interaction research.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 237
页数:10
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]  
Benitti FBV(2012)Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: a systematic review Comp Educ 58 978-988
[2]  
Mubin O(2013)A review of the applicability of robots in education Technol Educ Learn 1 1-7
[3]  
Stevens CJ(2015)Learning with educational companion robots? Toward attitudes on education robots, predictors of attitudes, and application potentials for education robots Int J Soc Robot 7 875-888
[4]  
Shahid S(2015)Designing robotic teaching assistants: interaction design students’ and children’s views Lect Notes Comp Sci 9388 502-511
[5]  
Al Mahmud A(2007)The use of computer technology in university teaching and learning: a critical perspective J Comput Assit Lear 23 83-94
[6]  
Dong JJ(2010)Robots in society, society in robots. Mutual shaping of society and technology as a framework for social robot design Int J Soc Robot 2 439-450
[7]  
Reich-Stiebert N(2008)Co-creation and the new landscapes of design CoDesign 4 5-18
[8]  
Eyssel FA(2007)User design of customized products Mark Sci 26 268-280
[9]  
Obaid M(2009)Testing the value of customization: When do customers really prefer products tailored to their preferences? J Mark 73 103-121
[10]  
Barendregt W(2012)The IKEA effect. When labor leads to love J Consum Psychol 22 453-460