Influence of activator type on reaction kinetics, setting time, and compressive strength of alkali-activated mineral wools

被引:0
作者
J. Yliniemi
B. Walkley
J. L. Provis
P. Kinnunen
M. Illikainen
机构
[1] University of Oulu,Fibre and Particle Engineering Research Unit
[2] The University of Sheffield,Department of Materials Science and Engineering
[3] The University of Sheffield,Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering
来源
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry | 2021年 / 144卷
关键词
Alkali-activated binders; Geopolymer; Isothermal calorimetry; Stone wool; Glass wool; Sustainability;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Alkali activation is a promising utilisation route for mineral wool wastes, due to suitable chemical composition, high reactivity, and surface area. One key factor in the development of alkali-activated binders is the selection of the suitable alkali activator. Here, the effect of sodium hydroxide, sodium silicate, sodium aluminate, and sodium carbonate solution on the alkali-activation kinetics of two main types of mineral wools, stone wool and glass wool, is investigated. Setting time and compressive strength development results are presented, which are explained and discussed in the context of isothermal calorimeter data obtained at temperature of 40 °C. Sodium hydroxide and sodium silicate solutions provided fast reaction with both mineral wools, evidenced by high heat release, high early strength, and fast setting. The reaction with sodium aluminate solution took several days to initiate, but it produced high compressive strength after 28 days of curing with both mineral wools. Glass wool reacted and hardened rapidly with sodium carbonate solution, but stone wool reacted slowly with sodium carbonate and exhibited a low extent of reaction, likely due to lower extent of reaction of stone wool under less alkaline conditions. These results show that mineral wool alkali activation kinetics and binder gel formation are controlled by the activator type and highlight the importance of choosing the most appropriate activator for each desired application.
引用
收藏
页码:1129 / 1138
页数:9
相关论文
共 96 条
  • [1] Provis JL(2018)Alkali-activated materials Cem Concr Res 114 40-48
  • [2] van Deventer JSJ(2012)Technical and commercial progress in the adoption of geopolymer cement Miner Eng 29 89-104
  • [3] Provis JL(2013)Mineral wool waste in Europe: a review of mineral wool waste quantity, quality, and current recycling methods J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 16 62-72
  • [4] Duxson P(2020)Effect of built-in mineral wool insulations durability on its thermal and mechanical performance J Therm Anal Calorim 139 169-181
  • [5] Väntsi O(2017)Rockwool waste in fly ash geopolymer composites J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 19 1220-1227
  • [6] Kärki T(2016)Utilization of mineral wools as alkali-activated material precursor Materials 9 312-1961
  • [7] Nagy B(2017)Kinetics study of geopolymerization of fly ash using isothermal conduction calorimetry J Therm Anal Calorim 127 1953-743
  • [8] Simon TK(2006)Heat evolution in alkali activated synthetic slag–metakaolin mixtures J Therm Anal Calorim 86 739-56
  • [9] Nemes R(2019)Effect of silicate modulus of water glass on the hydration of alkali-activated converter steel slag J Therm Anal Calorim 138 47-30
  • [10] Kinnunen P(2001)Calorimetric study of alkaline activation of calcium hydroxide–metakaolin solid mixtures Cem Concr Res 31 25-23