Trade-off between double cleavage-stage embryos transfer and single blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in patients with few good quality embryos in antagonist cycles: a retrospective study using a propensity score matching analysis

被引:3
作者
Han, Yan [1 ]
Deng, Xing [1 ]
Cai, Jiali [2 ,3 ]
Peng, Wei [1 ]
Duan, Chaoqun [1 ]
Huang, Kezhen [2 ]
机构
[1] Yichun Maternal & Child Hlth Hosp, Assisted Reprod Dept, Yichun, Peoples R China
[2] Xiamen Univ, Reprod Med Ctr, Affiliated Chenggong Hosp, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[3] Xiamen Univ, Sch Med, Xiamen, Peoples R China
关键词
Assisted Reproductive Technology(ART); Embryo transfer(ET); In Vitro fertilization(IVF); Double cleavage-stage embryo transfer(DET); Single blastocyst transfer(SBT); Antagonist; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; LIVE BIRTH-RATE; CULTURE; IMPLANTATION; SOCIETY; RATES; TWINS; TIME;
D O I
10.1186/s12884-024-06537-5
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective This study aimed to compare the per OPU clinical outcomes for transfer of Day 3 double cleavage-stage embryos (DET) and Day 5 single blastocyst-stage (SBT) in patients with five or fewer good quality embryos on day 3 per occyte pick-up cycle (OPU) in antagonist cycles with consideration of blastocyst formation failure. Methods This was a retrospective, observational cohort study of 2,116 cases of OPU treated with antagonist protocol in the affiliated Chenggong Hospital of Xiamen University between January 2013 and December 2020. DET was performed in 1,811cycles and SBT was performed in 305 cycles. The DET group was matched to the SBT group by propensity score (PS) matching according to multiple maternal baseline covariates. After PS matching, there were 303 ET cycles in each group. The primary outcomes were the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR), cumulative multiple pregnancy rate(CMPR)per OPU and the number of ET to achieve live birth per OPU. Secondary outcomes were the percentage of clinical pregnancy(CPR), live birth rate(LBR), multiple pregnancy rate(MPR). Results Following PS mating, the CLBR was slightly higher (48.8% versus 40.3% ; P = 0.041) and the CMPR was significantly higher in the DET group compared to SBT group(44.2% versus 7.9%, P < 0.001). The CPR, LBR and MPR per fresh transfer were higher in DET group compared to SBT group(50.2% versus 28.7%; 41.3% versus 21.5%;29.6% versus 0%, P < 0.001). The number of ET to achieve live birth per OPU in SBT group was obiviously more than in DET group(1.48 +/- 0.578 versus 1.22 +/- 0.557 ,P < 0.001). Conclusion With a marginal difference cumulative live birth rate, the lower live birth rate per fresh transfer and higher number of ET per OPU in the SBT group suggested that it might take longer time to achieve a live birth with single blastocyst strategy. A trade-off decision should be made between efficiency and safety.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 46 条
[11]   Ongoing and cumulative pregnancy rate after cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer using vitrification for cryopreservation: Impact of age on the results [J].
Fernandez-Shaw, S. ;
Cercas, R. ;
Brana, C. ;
Villas, C. ;
Pons, I. .
JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2015, 32 (02) :177-184
[12]   Considerations for future modification of The Association for the Study of Reproductive Biology embryo grading system incorporating time-lapse observations [J].
Garcia-Belda, Ana ;
Cairo, Olga ;
Martinez-Moro, Alvaro ;
Cuadros, Muriel ;
Pons, Maria Carme ;
de Mendoza, Maria V. Hurtado ;
Delgado, Arantza ;
Rives, Natalia ;
Carrasco, Beatriz ;
Cabello, Yolanda ;
Figueroa, Maria J. ;
Cascales-Romero, Laura ;
Gonzalez-Soto, Bea ;
Cuevas-Saiz, Irene .
REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2024, 48 (01)
[13]   Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer [J].
Gardner, DK ;
Lane, M ;
Stevens, J ;
Schlenker, T ;
Schoolcraft, WB .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2000, 73 (06) :1155-1158
[14]   Transferring more than one embryo simultaneously is justifiable in most patients [J].
Gleicher, Norbert ;
Orvieto, Raoul .
REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2022, 44 (01) :1-4
[15]   Cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology [J].
Glujovsky, Demian ;
Quinteiro Retamar, Andrea Marta ;
Alvarez Sedo, Cristian Roberto ;
Ciapponi, Agustin ;
Cornelisse, Simone ;
Blake, Deborah .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2022, (05)
[16]   Cleavage-stage or blastocyst transfer: what are the benefits and harms? [J].
Glujovsky, Demian ;
Farquhar, Cynthia .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2016, 106 (02) :244-250
[17]  
Ho DE, 2011, J STAT SOFTW, V42
[18]   Improved outcomes after blastocyst-stage frozen-thawed embryo transfers compared with cleavage stage: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technologies Clinical Outcomes Reporting System study [J].
Holden, Emily C. ;
Kashani, Banafsheh N. ;
Morelli, Sara S. ;
Alderson, Donald ;
Jindal, Sangita K. ;
Ohman-Strickland, Pamela A. ;
McGovern, Peter G. .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2018, 110 (01) :89-+
[19]   The effect of embryo selection using time-lapse monitoring on IVF/ICSI outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Jiang, Yanbiao ;
Wang, Liyan ;
Wang, Sha ;
Shen, Haofei ;
Wang, Bin ;
Zheng, Jianxiu ;
Yang, Jinwei ;
Ma, Bin ;
Zhang, Xuehong .
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2023, 49 (12) :2792-2803
[20]   Factors affecting the success of human blastocyst development and pregnancy following in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer [J].
Jones, GM ;
Trounson, AO ;
Lolatgis, N ;
Wood, C .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1998, 70 (06) :1022-1029