Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of PET and SPECT for Coronary Artery Disease

被引：1
作者：
Parker M.W. [1 ,2 ]
机构：
[1] University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT
[2] Division of Cardiology, Hartford Hospital, 80 Seymour Street, Hartford, 06102, CT
来源：
Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports | 2015年 / 8卷 / 1期
关键词：
Diagnostic accuracy; Myocardial perfusion imaging; Position emission tomography; Single photon emission computed tomography;
D O I：
10.1007/s12410-014-9302-0
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Noninvasive assessment with a technique such as single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) or positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is common and appropriate before coronary angiography to define coronary anatomy. The diagnostic accuracy of these techniques has been extensively studied with over well over 100 publications reporting the sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, and diagnostic odds ratio for identifying coronary artery disease with both of them throughout their evolution. Meta-analytic techniques have emerged to combine diagnostic accuracy studies while retaining the 2-dimensional value of sensitivity and specificity data. Recent diagnostic accuracy meta-analyses estimated sensitivity and specificity for SPECT for coronary artery disease at 85 %–88 % and 76 %–85 %, respectively, and the corresponding values for PET at 90 %–92 % and 81 %–88 %. These meta-analytic estimates will be reviewed along with areas of ongoing work with myocardial blood flow measurement and hybrid SPECT/CT and PET/CT imaging systems that will continue improve the diagnostic performance of nuclear techniques. © 2014, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
引用
收藏
页码：1 / 12
页数：11
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] Levine G.N., Bates E.R., Blankenship J.C., Et al., ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice guidelines and the society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions, J Am Coll Cardiol, 58, pp. e44-e122, (2011)
  • [2] Altman D.G., Bland J.M., Statistics notes. Diagnostic tests 1: sensitivity and specificity, BMJ, 308, (1994)
  • [3] Altman D.G., Bland J.M., Statistics notes. Diagnostic tests 3: receiver operating characteristic plots, BMJ, 309, (1994)
  • [4] Mallett S., Halligan S., Thompson M., Collins G.S., Altman D.G., Interpreting diagnostic accuracy studies for patient care, BMJ, 345, (2012)
  • [5] White C.W., Wright C.B., Doty D.B., Et al., Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the physiologic importance of a coronary stenosis?, N Engl J Med, 310, pp. 819-824, (1984)
  • [6] Fleming R.M., Kirkeeide R.L., Smalling R.W., Gould K.L., Patterns in visual interpretation of coronary arteriograms as detected by quantitative coronary arteriography, J Am Coll Cardiol, 18, pp. 945-951, (1991)
  • [7] Vas R., Eigler N., Miyazono C., Et al., Digital quantification eliminates intra-observer and inter-observer variability in the evaluation of coronary artery stenosis, Am J Cardiol, 56, pp. 718-723, (1985)
  • [8] Wolk M.J., Bailey S.R., Doherty J.U., Et al., ACCF/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2013 multimodality appropriate use criteria for the detection and risk assessment of stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiogr
  • [9] Gould K.L., Johnson N.P., Bateman T.M., Et al., Anatomic versus physiologic assessment of coronary artery disease. Role of coronary flow reserve, fractional flow reserve, and positron emission tomography imaging in revascularization decision-making, J Am Coll Cardiol, 62, pp. 1639-1653, (2013)
  • [10] De Bruyne B., Baudhuin T., Melin J.A., Et al., Coronary flow reserve calculated from pressure measurements in humans. Validation with positron emission tomography, Circulation, 89, pp. 1013-1022, (1994)
123456