Fear of pesticide residues and preference for domestically produced strawberries

被引:4
作者
Anna Birgitte Milford
Nina Trandem
Armando José Garcia Pires
机构
[1] Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NIBIO),Division of Food Production and Society
[2] Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NIBIO),Division of Biotechnology and Plant Health
[3] Centre for applied research at NHH (SNF),undefined
关键词
Strawberries; Country of origin; Pesticides; Norway; Willingness to pay (WTP); Integrated pest management (IPM);
D O I
10.1007/s41130-020-00134-8
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Due to an EU directive making integrated pest management (IPM) mandatory, European farmers are expected to reduce their use of chemical pesticides, which may potentially increase production costs and risk of harvest loss. Less pesticide use is appreciated by many consumers and may generate a higher willingness to pay (WTP). However, IPM is a wide concept and it is difficult for consumers to distinguish between products with high and low risk of pesticide residues. As a result, consumers might use other characteristics, such as country of origin, for the identification of safer products. In this study, we investigate if a higher WTP for Norwegian strawberries is associated with a belief that they contain less pesticide residues than imported berries. We use regression analysis to estimate to what extent the difference in WTP for Norwegian and imported strawberries is correlated with various perceptions about strawberries. The analyses reveal that the stronger the belief that Norwegian strawberries have less pesticide risk than imported ones, the higher the WTP for Norwegian strawberries. This means that if consumers believe domestic farmers use little pesticides, domestic products might be able to sell at considerably higher prices than imports. Hence, it may be economically beneficial for farmers to keep pesticide use at a minimum. Furthermore, we find that consumers have a higher WTP for strawberries produced with less use of pesticides, although not pesticide-free, indicating that IPM is appreciated.
引用
收藏
页码:369 / 391
页数:22
相关论文
共 103 条
[1]  
Ahmed ZU(2004)Does country of origin matter for low-involvement products? International Marketing Review 21 102-120
[2]  
Johnson JP(2003)European consumers’ willingness to pay for US beef in experimental auction markets American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85 396-405
[3]  
Yang X(1996)Consumer response to integrated pest management and certification Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 60 97-106
[4]  
Fatt CK(2015)Eight principles of integrated pest management Agronomy for Sustainable Development 35 1199-1215
[5]  
Teng HS(2014)Willingness to pay for pesticide reduction in the EU: nothing but organic? European Review of Agricultural Economics 41 87-109
[6]  
Boon LC(2001)An economic evaluation of the environmental benefits from pesticide reduction Agricultural Economics 25 219-226
[7]  
Alfnes F(2009)Does taste beat food safety? Evidence from the “Pêra Rocha” case in Portugal Journal of Food Products Marketing 16 60-78
[8]  
Rickertsen K(2016)Estimating the demand curve for sustainable use of pesticides from contingent-valuation data Ecological Economics 127 121-128
[9]  
Anderson MD(2006)Effects of genotype and environment on total anti-oxidant capacity and the content of sugars and acids in strawberries (Fragaria X ananassa Duch.) The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 81 1057-1063
[10]  
Hollingsworth CS(1994)Pesticide-residue risk and food safety valuation - a random utility approach American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76 760-771