Wetland economic valuation approaches and prospects in China

被引:0
作者
Bo Jiang
Christina P. Wong
Lijuan Cui
Zhiyun Ouyang
机构
[1] Chinese Academy of Sciences,State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco
[2] Changjiang Water Resources Protection Institute,Environmental Sciences
[3] Arizona State University,School of Sustainability
[4] Chinese Academy of Forestry,Institute of Wetland Research
来源
Chinese Geographical Science | 2016年 / 26卷
关键词
ecosystem services; wetlands; economic valuation; methodological gaps; China;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Ecosystem services valuation seeks to increase the social relevance of ecosystem characteristics, the underlying biological mechanisms that support services, by making the contribution of ecosystems to human well-being explicit. Economic valuation can help management by clarifying the full range of benefits and costs of proposed management actions. In the past two decades, economic valuation of wetland ecosystem services has become one of the most significant scientific priorities for wetland protection. In this paper, we provide an overview of ecosystem services, and summarize the main interdisciplinary approaches to measure and value wetland ecosystem services. We identified four main methodological gaps preventing progress on wetland valuation of ecosystem services in China, which are: 1) confusion on terminology like intermediate and final ecosystem services, 2) lack of ecological production functions to link ecosystem characteristics to final ecosystem services, 3) static valuation making it difficult to evaluate the trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services, and 4) lack of clear guidance on relating ecological compensation programs to conservation targets. Overcoming these gaps is important to inform wetland compensation mechanisms and conservation policies. We propose future research on wetland ecosystem services in China should be focused on: 1) defining final ecosystem services based on beneficiary preferences and underlying biophysical mechanisms, 2) establishing wetland monitoring programs at specific sites to collect data on final ecosystem service indicators and ecosystem characteristic metrics to create ecological production functions for economic valuation and rescaling techniques, and 3) incorporating wetland ecosystem service values into decision-making processes to inform wetland management.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 154
页数:11
相关论文
共 146 条
[1]  
Allen H(2002)Wahi-Ngaro (the Lost Portion): strengthening relationships between people and wetlands in north Taranaki, New Zealand World Archaeology 34 315-329
[2]  
Johns D(2008)coastal ecosystem-based management with nonlinear ecological functions and values Science 319 321-323
[3]  
Phillips C(2000)On measuring economic values for nature Environmental Science and Technology 34 1384-1389
[4]  
Barbier E B(2007)What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units Ecological Economics 63 616-626
[5]  
Koch E W(2006)The empirics of wetland valuation: a comprehensive summary and a meta-analysis of the literature Environmental and Resource Economics 33 223-250
[6]  
Silliman B R(1999)A meta-analysis of wetland contingent valuation studies Regional Environmental Change 1 47-57
[7]  
Bockstael N(2009)Net ecosystem services value of wetland: environmental economic account Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation 14 2837-2843
[8]  
Freeman A M(2000)Value of ecosystem services in China Chinese Science Bulletin 45 870-876
[9]  
Kopp R(1997)The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital Nature 387 253-260
[10]  
Boyd J(2008)The impact of water quality and water level on the recreation values of Lake Hume Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 15 21-29