Marker assisted improvement of low soil phosphorus tolerance in the bacterial blight resistant, fine-grain type rice variety, Improved Samba Mahsuri

被引:0
作者
H. K. Mahadeva Swamy
M. Anila
R. R. Kale
G. Rekha
V. P. Bhadana
M. S. Anantha
P. Brajendra
C. H. Balachiranjeevi
S. K. Hajira
B. Laxmi Prasanna
K. Pranathi
T. Dilip
M. B. V. N. Kousik
G. Harika
K. Surekha
R. Mahender Kumar
C. Cheralu
V. Gouri Shankar
G. S. Laha
M. S. Prasad
L. V. Subba Rao
M. S. Madhav
S. M. Balachandran
R. M. Sundaram
机构
[1] ICAR-Indian Institute of Rice Research (IIRR),Crop Improvement Section
[2] ICAR-Indian Institute of Agricultural Biotechnology (IIAB),College of Agriculture
[3] ICAR- Sugarcane Breeding Institute (SBI),undefined
[4] PJTSAU,undefined
来源
Scientific Reports | / 10卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Improved-Samba-Mahsuri (ISM), a high-yielding, popular bacterial blight resistant (possessing Xa21, xa13, and xa5), fine-grain type, low glycemic index rice variety is highly sensitive to low soil phosphorus (P). We have deployed marker-assisted backcross breeding (MABB) approach for targeted transfer of Pup1, a major QTL associated with low soil P tolerance, using Swarna as a donor. A new co-dominant marker, K20-1-1, which is specific for Pup1 was designed and used for foreground selection along with functional markers specific for the bacterial blight resistance genes, Xa21, xa13, and xa5. A set of 66 polymorphic SSR marker were used for the background selection along with a pair of flanking markers for the recombination selection in backcross derived progenies and in BC2F2 generation, 12 plants, which are homozygous for Pup1, all the three bacterial blight resistance genes and possessing agro-morphological traits equivalent to or better than ISM were selected and selfed to produce BC2F3s. They were evaluated in plots with low soil P and normal soil P at ICAR-IIRR, Hyderabad for their low soil P tolerance, and bacterial blight resistance and superior lines were advanced to BC2F6. One of the lines, when tested at multiple locations in India was found promising under both normal as well as low soil P conditions.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
Wissuwa M(1998)Mapping of QTLs for phosphorus deficiency tolerance in rice ( Theor. Appl. Genet. 97 777-783
[2]  
Yano M(1998) L.) Phosphorus Potassium 217 25-31
[3]  
Ae N(2009)Phosphorus availability in the 21st century: management of a nonrenewable resource Glob. Environ. Change 19 292-305
[4]  
Steen I(2011)The story of phosphorus: global food security and food for thought Sustainability 3 2027-2049
[5]  
Cordell D(1996)Peak phosphorus: clarifying the key issues of a vigorous debate about long-term phosphorus security Better Crops Int. 10 4-5
[6]  
Drangert JO(2001)Phosphorus status of soils in India Better Crops Int. 15 23-32
[7]  
White S(2014)Phosphorus needs of Indian soils and crops Sociotechnica 11 119-126
[8]  
Cordell D(1997)Analysis of phosphorus dependency in Asia J. Plant Nutr. 20 499-509
[9]  
White S(1988)Upland rice genotypes evaluation for phosphorus use efficiency J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 111 105-109
[10]  
Hasan R(2006)Rice cultivar evaluation for phosphorus use efficiency Pak. J. Nutr. 5 206-211