EMF 35 JMIP study for Japan’s long-term climate and energy policy: scenario designs and key findings

被引:0
作者
Masahiro Sugiyama
Shinichiro Fujimori
Kenichi Wada
Ken Oshiro
Etsushi Kato
Ryoichi Komiyama
Diego Silva Herran
Yuhji Matsuo
Hiroto Shiraki
Yiyi Ju
机构
[1] The University of Tokyo,Institute for Future Initiatives
[2] Kyoto University,Graduate School of Engineering
[3] National Institute for Environmental Studies,School of Engineering
[4] Research Institute of Innovative Technology for the Earth,undefined
[5] Institute of Applied Energy,undefined
[6] The University of Tokyo,undefined
[7] Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES),undefined
[8] Institute of Energy Economics,undefined
[9] Japan,undefined
[10] The University of Shiga Prefecture,undefined
[11] International Institute for Applied System Analysis (IIASA),undefined
来源
Sustainability Science | 2021年 / 16卷
关键词
Climate change mitigation; Integrated assessment; Long-term strategy; National climate policy; Uncertainty; Carbon neutrality; Net-zero emissions;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In June, 2019, Japan submitted its mid-century strategy to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and pledged 80% emissions cuts by 2050. The strategy has not gone through a systematic analysis, however. The present study, Stanford Energy Modeling Forum (EMF) 35 Japan Model Intercomparison project (JMIP), employs five energy-economic and integrated assessment models to evaluate the nationally determined contribution and mid-century strategy of Japan. EMF 35 JMIP conducts a suite of sensitivity analyses on dimensions including emissions constraints, technology availability, and demand projections. The results confirm that Japan needs to deploy all of its mitigation strategies at a substantial scale, including energy efficiency, electricity decarbonization, and end-use electrification. Moreover, they suggest that with the absence of structural changes in the economy, heavy industries will be one of the hardest to decarbonize. Partitioning of the sum of squares based on a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) reconfirms that mitigation strategies, such as energy efficiency and electrification, are fairly robust across models and scenarios, but that the cost metrics are uncertain. There is a wide gap of policy strength and breadth between the current policy instruments and those suggested by the models. Japan should strengthen its climate action in all aspects of society and economy to achieve its long-term target.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 374
页数:19
相关论文
共 134 条
[1]  
Aldy J(2016)Economic tools to promote transparency and comparability in the Paris Agreement Nat Clim Change 6 1000-1004
[2]  
Pizer W(2020)The impact of the Tokyo emissions trading scheme on office buildings: what factor contributed to the emission reduction? Environ Econ Policy Stud 34 S251-S260
[3]  
Tavoni M(2012)The role of Asia in mitigating climate change: results from the Asia modeling exercise Energy Econ 101 612-628
[4]  
Arimura TH(2017)Comparing electricity transitions: a historical analysis of nuclear, wind and solar power in Germany and Japan Energy Policy 42 200-214
[5]  
Abe T(2014)Technology and US emissions reductions goals: results of the EMF 24 modeling exercise Energy J 39 3741-3749
[6]  
Calvin K(2018)Net-zero emissions energy systems Science 75 379-391
[7]  
Clarke L(2017)Long-term economic growth projections in the shared socioeconomic pathways Glob Environ Change 10 1-11
[8]  
Krey V(2011)Japan’s new basic energy plan Energy Policy 13 063002-302
[9]  
Cherp A(2014)Introduction to EMF 24 Energy J 98 290-527
[10]  
Vinichenko V(2014)The effectiveness of energy service demand reduction: a scenario analysis of global climate change mitigation Energy Policy 3 515-137