Evolutionary explanations in medical and health profession courses: Are you answering your students' "why" questions?

被引:22
作者
Harris E.E. [1 ]
Malyango A.A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Biological Sciences and Geology, Queensborough Community College, City University of New York, New York City, NY
[2] Department of Cell Biology, New York University, School of Medicine, New York City, NY
关键词
Cystic Fibrosis; Natural Selection; Sickle Cell Disease; Sickle Cell; Typhoid Fever;
D O I
10.1186/1472-6920-5-16
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Medical and pre-professional health students ask questions about human health that can be answered in two ways, by giving proximate and evolutionary explanations. Proximate explanations, most common in textbooks and classes, describe the immediate scientifically known biological mechanisms of anatomical characteristics or physiological processes. These explanations are necessary but insufficient. They can be complemented with evolutionary explanations that describe the evolutionary processes and principles that have resulted in human biology we study today. The main goal of the science of Darwinian Medicine is to investigate human disease, disorders, and medical complications from an evolutionary perspective. Discussion: This paper contrasts the differences between these two types of explanations by describing principles of natural selection that underlie medical questions. Thus, why is human birth complicated? Why does sickle cell anemia exist? Why do we show symptoms like fever, diarrhea, and coughing when we have infection? Why do we suffer from ubiquitous age-related diseases like arteriosclerosis, Alzheimer's and others? Why are chronic diseases like type II diabetes and obesity so prevalent in modern society? Why hasn't natural selection eliminated the genes that cause common genetic diseases like hemochromatosis, cystic fibrosis, Tay sachs, PKU and others? Summary: In giving students evolutionary explanations professors should underscore principles of natural selection, since these can be generalized for the analysis of many medical questions. From a research perspective, natural selection seems central to leading hypotheses of obesity and type II diabetes and might very well explain the occurrence of certain common genetic diseases like cystic fibrosis, hemochromatosis, Tay sachs, Fragile X syndrome, G6PD and others because of their compensating advantages. Furthermore, armed with evolutionary explanations, health care professionals can bring practical benefits to patients by treating their symptoms of infection more specifically and judiciously. They might also help curtail the evolutionary arms race between pathogens and antibiotic defenses. © 2005 Harris and Malyango; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 45 条
[21]  
Pier G.B., Grout M., Zaidi T., Meluleni G., Mueschenborn S.S., Banting G., Ratcliff R., Evans M.J., Colledge W.H., Salmonella typhi uses CFTR to enter intestinal epithelial cells, Nature, 393, 6680, pp. 79-82, (1998)
[22]  
Lyczak J.B., Cannon C.L., Pier G.B., Lung infections associated with cystic fibrosis, Clin Microbiol Rev, 15, 2, pp. 194-222, (2002)
[23]  
Eaton S.B., Strassman B.I., Nesse R.M., Neel J.V., Ewald P.W., Williams G.C., Weder A.B., Eaton III S.B., Lindeberg S., Konner M.J., Mysterud I., Cordain L., Evolutionary health promotion, Prev Med, 34, pp. 109-118, (2002)
[24]  
Eaton S.B., Cordain L., Lindeberg S., Evolutionary health promotion: A consideration of common counterarguments, Prev Med, 34, pp. 119-123, (2002)
[25]  
Neel J.V., Weder A.B., Julius S., Type II diabetes, essential hypertension, and obesity as "syndromes of impaired genetic homeostasis": The "thrifty genotype" hypothesis enters the 21st century, Perspect Biol Med, 42, 1, pp. 44-74, (1998)
[26]  
Banks W.A., Coon A.B., Robinson S.M., Moinuddin A., Shultz J.M., Nakaoke R., Morley J.E., Triglycerides induce leptin resistance at the blood brain barrier, Diabetes, 53, pp. 1253-1260, (2004)
[27]  
Banks W.A., The many lives of leptin, Peptides, 25, pp. 331-338, (2004)
[28]  
Neel J.V., Diabetes Mellitus: A thrifty genotype rendered detrimental by "progress"?, Am J Hum Genet, 14, pp. 353-362, (1962)
[29]  
Williams G.C., Pleiotropy, natural selection, and the evolution of senescence, Evolution Int J Org Evolution, 11, pp. 398-411, (1957)
[30]  
Wick G., Berger P., Jansen-Durr P., Grubeck-Loebenstein B., A Darwinian evolutionary concept of age-related diseases, Exp Gerontol, 38, pp. 13-25, (2003)