Orchestrating Mathematical Classroom Discourse About Various Solution Methods: Case Study of a Teacher’s Development; [Mathematische Diskurse über verschiedene Lösungsmethoden im Klassenraum ermöglichen: Fallstudie zur Entwicklung einer Lehrperson]

被引:0
作者
Kooloos C. [1 ]
Oolbekkink-Marchand H. [1 ]
Kaenders R. [2 ]
Heckman G. [3 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Teachers Academy, Radboud University Nijmegen, Erasmusplein 1, Nijmegen
[2] Mathematical Institute, University of Bonn, Endenicher Allee 60, Bonn
[3] Department of Mathematics, Radboud University Nijmegen, 9010, Nijmegen
关键词
Classroom discourse; Interaction; Multiple solution methods; Professional development; Upper secondary education;
D O I
10.1007/s13138-019-00150-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Developing and orchestrating classroom discourse about students’ different solution methods is an essential yet complex task for mathematics teachers. This study reports on the first stages of classroom discourse development of one Dutch higher secondary school mathematics teacher who had no prior experience in including classroom discourse in her teaching practice. Four lessons in analytic geometry were developed iteratively, in collaboration with the teacher. The lessons consisted of students working on a mathematical problem plus classroom discourse concerning students’ different solution methods. Classroom discourse video recordings were collected and analyzed in order to develop a framework to characterize the teacher’s actions, and to describe the change in the teacher’s role in classroom discourse. The results reveal three main changes in the teacher’s role: First, the way the teacher reacted to correct or incorrect solution methods shifted from confirming or setting aside suggestions, toward making the solution methods the subject of discussion; second, the distribution of turns changed such that more students were involved in the discourse and in reacting to each other’s solution methods; third, the teacher’s actions shifted from convergent, teacher-led actions toward divergent, student-led actions. These results show that within four lessons, an important step has been taken toward establishing a discourse community. © 2019, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 389
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ball D.a.€..L., Uncovering the special mathematical work of teaching, Proceedings of the 13Th International Congress on Mathematical Education., pp. 11-35, (2017)
  • [2] Ball D.a.€..L., Thames M.a.€..H., Phelps G., Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special?, Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 5, pp. 389-407, (2008)
  • [3] Blockhuis C., Fisser P., Grievink B., Voorde T.M., Leermiddelenmonitor (report on teaching materials) 15/16, (2016)
  • [4] Cazden C.B., Classroom discourse: the language of teaching and learning, 2, (2001)
  • [5] Cengiz N., Kline K., Grant T.a.€..J., Extending students’ mathematical thinking during whole-group discussions, Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14, 5, pp. 355-374, (2011)
  • [6] Cobb P., Confrey J., Disessa A., Lehrer R., Schauble L., Design experiments in educational research, Educational Researcher, 32, 1, pp. 9-13, (2003)
  • [7] Cobb P., Wood T., Yackel E., Discourse, mathematical thinking, and classroom practice, Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children’s development, pp. 91-119, (1993)
  • [8] Cohen L., Manion L., Morrison K., Research Methods in Education, (2011)
  • [9] Darling-Hammond L., Hyler M.E., Gardner M., Effective teacher professional development, (2017)
  • [10] Drageset O.a.€..G., Redirecting, progressing, and focusing actions - a framework for describing how teachers use students’ comments to work with mathematics, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85, 2, pp. 281-304, (2014)