Basal and glucose-suppressed GH levels less than 1 μg/L in newly diagnosed acromegaly

被引:53
作者
Pamela U. Freda
Carlos M. Reyes
Abu T. Nuruzzaman
Robert E. Sundeen
Jeffrey N. Bruce
机构
[1] Department of Medicine, Columbia College of Physicians/Surg., New York, NY 10032
[2] Department of Neurosurgery, Columbia College of Physicians/Surg., New York, NY 10032
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Acromegaly; Growth hormone; IGF-I;
D O I
10.1023/B:PITU.0000023424.72021.e2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The development of highly sensitive and specific GH assays has necessitated a critical re-evaluation of the biochemical criteria needed for the diagnosis of acromegaly. Use of these assays has revealed that GH levels after oral glucose in healthy subjects and postoperative patients with active acromegaly can be significantly less than previously recognized with older GH assays. In order to assess GH criteria for newly diagnosed acromegaly with a modern assay we have evaluated GH levels in 25 patients referred to our Neuroendocrine Unit for evaluation of untreated acromegaly. All patients underwent measurement of basal GH and IGF-I levels and 15 of these patients also underwent oral glucose tolerance testing for GH suppression (OGTT). BasalGH levels were <1.0 μg/L at diagnosis in 5 of these 25 patients. Nadir GH levels were less than 1 μg/L also in 5 of 15 patients, and as low as 0.42 μg/L. All patients had elevated IGF-I levels preoperatively and pathological confirmation of a GH secreting pituitary tumor at the time of transsphenoidal surgery. The clinical presentations of these patients was variable. Most patients presented with classical manifestations of acromegaly, but 3 of the 5 patients with low nadir GH values had only very subtle signs of acromegaly. Although most newly diagnosed patients have classically elevated GH levels and obvious clinical features of acromegaly, early recognition of disease may uncover patients with milder biochemical and clinical abnormalities. The diagnosis should not be discounted in patients who have elevated IGF-I levels, but have basal or nadir GH levels less than 1 μg/L. Conventional GH criteria for the diagnosis of acromegaly cannot be applied to the use of modern sensitive and specific GH assays. © 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 180
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Giustina A., Barkan A., Casanueva F.F., Cavagnini F., Frohman L., Ho K., Veldhuis J., Wass J., Von Werder K., Melmed S., Criteria for cure of acromegaly: A consensus statement, J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 85, pp. 526-529, (2000)
  • [2] Dimaraki E.V., Jaffe C.A., DeMott-Friberg R., Chandler W.F., Barkan A.L., Acromegaly with apparently normal GH secretion: Implications for diagnosis and follow-up, J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 87, pp. 3537-3542, (2002)
  • [3] Freda P.U., Post K.D., Powell J.S., Wardlaw S.L., Evaluation of disease status with sensitive measures of growth hormone secretion in 60 postoperative patients with acromegaly, J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 83, pp. 3808-3816, (1998)
  • [4] Freda P.U., Landman R.E., Sundeen R.E., Post K.D., Gender and age in the biochemical assessment of cure of acromegaly, Pituitary, 4, pp. 163-171, (2001)
  • [5] Freda P.U., Current concepts in the biochemical assessment of the patient with acromegaly, Growth Hormone & IGF Research, 13, pp. 171-184, (2003)
  • [6] Duncan E., Wass J.A., Investigation protocol: Acromegaly and its investigation, Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf.), 50, pp. 285-293, (1999)
  • [7] Chang-DeMoranville B.M., Jackson I.M., Diagnosis and endocrine testing in acromegaly, Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. North Am., 21, pp. 649-668, (1992)
  • [8] Hartman M.L., Veldhuis J.D., Thorner M.O., Normal control of growth hormone secretion, Horm. Res., 40, pp. 37-47, (1993)
  • [9] Bates A.S., Evans A.J., Jones P., Clayton R.N., Assessment of GH status in acromegaly using serum growth hormone, serum insulin-like growth factor-1 and urinary growth hormone excretion, Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf.), 42, pp. 417-423, (1995)
  • [10] Earll J.M., Sparks L.L., Forsham P.H., Glucose suppression of serum growth hormone in the diagnosis of acromegaly, JAMA, 201, pp. 628-630, (1967)