Open access initiatives in European universities: analysis of their implementation and the visibility of publications in the YERUN network

被引:0
作者
Daniela De Filippo
Jorge Mañana-Rodríguez
机构
[1] Carlos III University of Madrid,Department of Library and Information Sciences
[2] Research Institute for Higher Education and Science (INAECU) (UAM-UC3M),LEMI (Metric Information Studies Laboratory), Department of Library and Information Sciences
[3] Carlos III University of Madrid,undefined
来源
Scientometrics | 2020年 / 125卷
关键词
Open access; YERUN network; Bibliometric analysis; Document analysis; 62P25; C12;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this paper, the authors analyse the open access (OA) output of the universities in YERUN (the Young European Research Universities Network) and their institutional documentation of their own OA situation. The period from 2009 to 2019 was selected for the bibliometric analysis. The full register of publications for the YERUN universities was downloaded from Clarivate Analytics Web of Science Core Collection, and a set of bibliometric analyses was performed to provide an evidence-based response to the research questions (example: Do YERUN universities follow publication patterns similar to those of their countries of origin? How does OA affect the impact of scientific publications? What types of OA are used at each institution? Is there a relationship between specialization and OA?). The bibliometric analyses looked at four dimensions: activity and context indicators; collaboration indicators; specialization indicators; OA types and impact indicators. The document analysis included variables related to infrastructure, specific support actions, institutional policies and OA information availability. The paper concludes that the institutional measures and actions fostering OA identified on universities’ websites bear a correspondence with the bibliometric data. YERUN institutions have higher rates of OA publications than do their host countries, with a clear preference for the green route. OA publications are systematically more cited than non-OA publications, and green OA has more impact than do other types of OA. Also, no relationship was found between specialization and OA publication rate.
引用
收藏
页码:2667 / 2694
页数:27
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
Anglada L(2018)Qué es la ciencia abierta? Anuario ThinkEPI 12 292-298
[2]  
Abadal E(2010)Open access to the scientific journal literature: Situation 2009 PLoS ONE 19 32-48
[3]  
Björk B-C(2015)Measuring compliance with a spanish government open access mandate Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 5 e13636-238
[4]  
Welling P(2017)Institutional repositories versus researchgate: The depositing habits of spanish researchers Learned publishing 96 221-260
[5]  
Laakso M(2018)Open access levels: A quantitative exploration using web of science and oaDOI data PeerJ Preprints 24 247-2054
[6]  
Majlender P(2019)Alcances y limitaciones de la ciencia abierta en Latinoamérica: Análisis de las políticas públicas y publicaciones científicas de la región Hipertext.net 58 2047-1752
[7]  
Hedlund T(2010)Self-selected or mandated, open access increases citation impact for higher quality research PLoS ONE 121 1737-287
[8]  
Guðnason G(2013)On the impact of gold open access journals Scientometrics 82 263-345
[9]  
Borrego A(2011)Costs, risks and benefits in improving access to journal articles Learned Publishing 14 e0216597-62
[10]  
Borrego A(2017)Research output availability on academic social networks: Implications for stakeholders in academic publishing Electron Markets. 330 1097-undefined