Osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients with multiple myeloma treated with zoledronic acid

被引:0
作者
Sedat Cetiner
Gulsan Turkoz Sucak
Sevil Altundag Kahraman
Sahika Zeynep Akı
Benay Kocakahyaoglu
Sibel Elif Gultekin
Mustafa Cetiner
Rauf Haznedar
机构
[1] Gazi University,Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry
[2] Gazi University,Department of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine
[3] Gazi University,Department of Oral Pathology, Faculty of Dentistry
[4] Marmara University,Department of Hematology, Faculty of Medicine
来源
Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism | 2009年 / 27卷
关键词
Multiple myeloma; Jaw osteonecrosis; Zoledronic acid; Bisphosphonates; Thalidomide;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Intravenous bisphosphonates—the potent inhibitors of osteoclast-mediated bone resorption are among the most commonly prescribed drugs in the management of multiple myeloma (MM). Zoledronic acid (ZA) is a new generation potent intravenous bisphosphonate that has been approved for the treatment and prevention of bone lesions, and/or hypercalcemia associated with MM. Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) is an emerging serious side effect of the new generation bisphosphonates with a growing number of reports related to this pathological entity. ONJ usually appears following oral surgical and dental procedures but sometimes occur spontaneously. These cases are mostly seen and treated by dentists and oral surgeons. The aim of this study was to discuss the frequency, characteristics, risk factors, management and histopathological features of ZA induced ONJ based on the literature and illustrated with five own cases. Thirty-two patients with MM who received ZA for a median period of 26.5 ± 18.7 months (min: 5 months, max: 76 months) were evaluated. ONJ was detected in five patients and mean drug duration time was 34 months. The frequency was 15% and the patients were usually symptomatic. There was no significant difference in terms of the duration of ZA in patients with and without ONJ. Management of these established cases were performed with medical treatment, minor debridement, sequestrectomy, and combining bone resection with autologous platelet rich plasma. Our data indicate that ZA therapy has a major role in the development of ONJ a fact that should be considered by physicians treating MM patients.
引用
收藏
页码:435 / 443
页数:8
相关论文
共 173 条
[1]  
Dunstan CR(2007)Therapy insight: the risks and benefits of bisphosphonates for the treatment of tumor-induced bone disease Nat Clin Pract Oncol 4 42-55
[2]  
Felsenberg D(2005)Osteonecrosis of the maxilla in a patient with a history of bisphosphonate therapy J Can Dent Assoc 71 111-113
[3]  
Seibel MJ(2004)Bisphosphonates—a word of caution Ann Acad Med Singap 33 48-49
[4]  
Melo MD(2007)Bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaws—a therapeutic dilemma Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 103 e1-e5
[5]  
Obeid G(2004)Osteonecrosis of the jaws associated with the use of bisphosphonates: a review of 63 cases J Oral Maxillofac Surg 62 527-534
[6]  
Robinson NA(1989)Inhibition of osteoclast-like cell formation by bisphosphonates in long-term cultures of human bone marrow J Clin Invest 83 1930-1935
[7]  
Yeo JF(2000)Cellular and molecular mechanisms of action of bisphosphonates Cancer 15 2961-2978
[8]  
Diego R(1995)Bisphosphonates promote apoptosis in murine osteoclasts in vitro and in vivo J Bone Miner Res 10 1478-1487
[9]  
D’Orto O(2003)Pamidronate (Aredia) and zoledronate (Zometa) induced avascular necrosis of the jaws: a growing epidemic J Oral Maxillofac Surg 61 1115-1117
[10]  
Pagani D(2006)Incidence, risk factors and management of osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients with multiple myeloma: a single-centre experience in 303 patients Br J Haematol 134 620-623