Prediction of resilient modulus of fine-grained soil for pavement design using KNN, MARS, and random forest techniques

被引:0
作者
Chijioke Christopher Ikeagwuani
Chukwuebuka Chukwuemeka Nweke
Hyginus Nwankwo Onah
机构
[1] University of Nigeria,Civil Engineering Department
[2] University of Nigeria Nsukka,African Center of Excellence for Sustainable Power and Energy Development, ACE
[3] University of Southern California,SPED
关键词
Flexible pavement design; Hyperparameters; Mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide; Repeated load triaxial test; Supervised artificial intelligence techniques;
D O I
10.1007/s12517-023-11469-z
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study was motivated by the difficulty in determining the resilient modulus of soils using the repeated load triaxial test (RLTT) recommended by the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide (MEPDG). An alternative means to estimate the resilient modulus of fine-grained soils has been established in the form of three models that were developed using three supervised machine-learning techniques. This includes k-nearest neighbor (KNN), multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS), and random forest. The data utilized for the development of the models were sourced from the long-term pavement performance (LTPP) database domiciled in the Infopave database in the USA. A total of twelve routine soil properties that have significant influence on the resilient modulus of fine-grained soils were considered in this study. Results obtained from this study revealed that the three developed models (KNN, MARS, and random forest) had high prediction accuracy and high generalization ability. However, the random forest model, based on the statistical indices used to evaluate the models, gave the best prediction accuracy (R2 = 0.9312 for the testing dataset) of the three developed model. It was followed closely by the MARS model with an R2 value of 0.9057. The last model in terms of prediction accuracy was the KNN model with an R2 value of 0.8748. Furthermore, based on parameter significance assessment using the random forest model, it was revealed that the nominal maximum axial stress and confining pressure are the best predictor variables for the estimation of the resilient modulus of fine-grained soils.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 172 条
  • [1] Alwosheel A(2018)Is your dataset big enough? Sample size requirements when using artificial neural networks for discrete choice analysis J Choice Model 28 182-1588
  • [2] van Cranenburgh S(1997)Shape quantization and recognition with randomized trees Neural Comp 9 1545-10
  • [3] Chorus CG(2018)Correlation between resilient modulus (Mr) and constrained modulus (Mc) values of granular materials Const Build Mater 159 440-140
  • [4] Amit Y(2020)Modeling of agricultural soil compaction using discrete Bayesian networks Int J Environ Sci Technol 17 1-2383
  • [5] Geman D(1996)Bagging predictors Mach Learn 26 123-32
  • [6] Arshad M(1996)Heuristics of instability and stabilization in model selection Annals Stat 24 2350-961
  • [7] Ben Hassen H(2001)Random forests Mach Learn 45 5-148
  • [8] Elaoud A(2002)Analyzing bagging Annals Stat 30 927-15
  • [9] Masmoudi K(1985)Predicting resilient modulus: a study to determine the mechanical properties of subgrade soils Transp Res Rec J Trans Res Board 1043 145-27
  • [10] Breiman L(2012)Random forests for genomic data analysis Genomics 99 323-30