Natural rock joint roughness quantification through fractal techniques

被引:163
作者
Kulatilake P.H.S.W. [1 ]
Balasingam P. [1 ]
Park J. [1 ]
Morgan R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Geological Engineering Program, University of Arizona, Tucson
来源
Geotech. Geol. Eng. | 2006年 / 5卷 / 1181-1202期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Anisotropy; Fractals; Rock joints; Roughness; Scale effects; Two dimensions;
D O I
10.1007/s10706-005-1219-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Accurate quantification of roughness is important in modeling hydro-mechanical behavior of rock joints. A highly refined variogram technique was used to investigate possible existence of anisotropy in natural rock joint roughness. Investigated natural rock joints showed randomly varying roughness anisotropy with the direction. A scale dependant fractal parameter, Kv, seems to play a prominent role than the fractal dimension, Dr1d, with respect to quantification of roughness of natural rock joints. Because the roughness varies randomly, it is impossible to predict the roughness variation of rock joint surfaces from measurements made in only two perpendicular directions on a particular sample. The parameter D r1d × Kv seems to capture the overall roughness characteristics of natural rock joints well. The one-dimensional modified divider technique was extended to two dimensions to quantify the two-dimensional roughness of rock joints. The developed technique was validated by applying to a generated fractional Brownian surface with fractal dimension equal to 2.5. It was found that the calculated fractal parameters quantify the rock joint roughness well. A new technique is introduced to study the effect of scale on two-dimensional roughness variability and anisotropy. The roughness anisotropy and variability reduced with increasing scale. © Springer 2006.
引用
收藏
页码:1181 / 1202
页数:21
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Barton N., Review of a new shear strength criterion for rock joints, Engineering Geology, 7, pp. 287-332, (1973)
[2]  
Berry M.V., Lewis Z.V., On the Weierstrass-Mandelbrot fractal function, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A, 370, pp. 459-484, (1980)
[3]  
Brown S.R., Scholz C.H., Broad band width study of the topography of natural rock surfaces, Journal of Geophysics Research, 90, pp. 12575-12582, (1985)
[4]  
Den Outer A., Kaashoek J.F., Hack H.R.G.K., Difficulties with using continuous fractal theory for discontinuity surfaces, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science, 32, pp. 3-10, (1995)
[5]  
Dight P.M., Chiu H.K., Prediction of shear behavior of joints using profiles, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science & Geomechanics Abstracts, 15, pp. 303-307, (1981)
[6]  
Feder J., Fractals, (1988)
[7]  
Fisher N.I., Lewis T., Embleton B.J.J., Statistical Analysis of Spherical Data, (1987)
[8]  
Hsiung S.M., Ghosh A., Ahola M.P., Chowdhury A.H., Assessment of conventional methodologies for joint roughness coefficient determination, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science & Geomechanics Abstracts, 30, pp. 825-829, (1993)
[9]  
Huang S.L., Oelfke S.M., Speck R.C., Applicability of fractal characterization and modeling to rock joint profiles, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science, 29, pp. 89-98, (1992)
[10]  
Kodikara J.K., Johnston I.W., Shear behaviour of irregular triangular rock - Concrete joints, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science & Geomechanics Abstracts, 31, 4, pp. 313-322, (1994)