Long-Term Application of Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Does Not Improve Motor Learning in Parkinson’s Disease

被引:0
作者
Lidio Lima de Albuquerque
Milan Pantovic
Mitchell G. Clingo
Katherine M. Fischer
Sharon Jalene
Merrill R. Landers
Zoltan Mari
Brach Poston
机构
[1] University of North Carolina at Wilmington,School of Health and Applied Human Sciences
[2] University of Nevada Las Vegas,Department of Kinesiology and Nutrition Sciences
[3] University of Nevada Las Vegas,School of Medicine
[4] University of Nevada Las Vegas,Department of Physical Therapy
[5] Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health,Movement Disorders Program
来源
The Cerebellum | 2022年 / 21卷
关键词
Parkinson’s disease; Transcranial direct current stimulation; Motor skill; Cerebellum; Cerebellar stimulation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (c-tDCS) enhances motor skill acquisition and motor learning in young and old adults. Since the cerebellum is involved in the pathophysiology of Parkinson’s disease (PD), c-tDCS may represent an intervention with potential to improve motor learning in PD. The primary purpose was to determine the influence of long-term application of c-tDCS on motor learning in PD. The secondary purpose was to examine the influence of long-term application of c-tDCS on transfer of motor learning in PD. The study was a randomized, double-blind, SHAM-controlled, between-subjects design. Twenty-one participants with PD were allocated to either a tDCS group or a SHAM stimulation group. Participants completed 9 practice sessions over a 2-week period that involved extensive practice of an isometric pinch grip task (PGT) and a rapid arm movement task (AMT). These practice tasks were performed over a 25-min period concurrent with either anodal c-tDCS or SHAM stimulation. A set of transfer tasks that included clinical rating scales, manual dexterity tests, and lower extremity assessments were quantified in Test sessions at Baseline, 1, 14, and 28 days after the end of practice (EOP). There were no significant differences between the c-tDCS and SHAM groups as indicated by performance changes in the practice and transfer tasks from Baseline to the 3 EOP Tests. The findings indicate that long-term application of c-tDCS does not improve motor learning or transfer of motor learning to a greater extent than practice alone in PD.
引用
收藏
页码:333 / 349
页数:16
相关论文
共 345 条
[1]  
Bernheimer H(1973)Brain dopamine and the syndromes of Parkinson and Huntington. Clinical, morphological and neurochemical correlations J Neurol Sci 20 415-55
[2]  
Birkmayer W(2011)Exercise alleviates Parkinsonism: clinical and laboratory evidence Acta Neurol Scand 123 73-84
[3]  
Hornykiewicz O(2001)The biomechanics and motor control of gait in Parkinson disease Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 16 459-470
[4]  
Jellinger K(2012)Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): Challenges and future directions Brain Stimul 5 175-195
[5]  
Seitelberger F(2008)Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008 Brain Stimul 1 206-223
[6]  
Archer T(2017)Effects of tDCS on motor learning and memory formation: A consensus and critical position paper Clin Neurophysiol 128 589-603
[7]  
Fredriksson A(2020)Transcranial direct current stimulation combined with physical or cognitive training in people with Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review J Neuroeng Rehabil 17 74-117
[8]  
Johansson B(2015)Transcranial direct current stimulation in Parkinson’s disease: Neurophysiological mechanisms and behavioral effects Neurosci Biobehav Rev 57 105-540
[9]  
Morris ME(2014)Effects of different electrical brain stimulation protocols on subcomponents of motor skill learning Brain Stimul 7 532-117
[10]  
Huxham F(2013)Time- but not sleep-dependent consolidation of tDCS-enhanced visuomotor skills Cereb Cortex 25 109-1595