Residency training program paradigms for teaching robotic surgical skills to urology residents

被引:23
作者
Grover S. [1 ]
Tan G.Y. [1 ]
Srivastava A. [1 ]
Leung R.A. [1 ]
Tewari A.K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Urology, Weill Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY 10065, 525 East 68th Street
关键词
Education; Prostatectomy; Robotic; Training;
D O I
10.1007/s11934-010-0093-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The advent of laparoscopic and robotic techniques for management of urologic malignancies marked the beginning of an ever-expanding array of minimally invasive options available to cancer patients. With the popularity of these treatment modalities, there is a growing need for trained surgical oncologists who not only have a deep understanding of the disease process and adept surgical skills, but also show technical mastery in operating the equipment used to perform these techniques. Establishing a robotic prostatectomy program is a tremendous undertaking for any institution, as it involves a huge cost, especially in the purchasing and maintenance of the robot. Residency programs often face many challenges when trying to establish a balance between costs associated with robotic surgery and training of the urology residents, while maintaining an acceptable operative time. Herein we describe residency training program paradigms for teaching robotic surgical skills to urology residents. Our proposed paradigm outlines the approach to compensate for the cost involved in robotic training establishment without compromising the quality of education provided. With the potential advantages for both patients and surgeons, we contemplate that robotic-assisted surgery may become an integral component of residency training programs in the future. © 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 92
页数:5
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Box G.N., Ahlering T.E., Robotic radical prostatectomy: Long-term outcomes, Current Opinion in Urology, 18, 2, pp. 173-179, (2008)
  • [2] Tewari A., Srivasatava A., Menon M., A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: Experience in one institution, BJU International, 92, 3, pp. 205-210, (2003)
  • [3] Duchene D.A., Moinzadeh A., Gill I.S., Clayman R.V., Winfield H.N., Survey of residency training in laparoscopic and robotic surgery, Journal of Urology, 176, 5, pp. 2158-2167, (2006)
  • [4] Menon M., Robotic radical retropubic prostatectomy, BJU International, 91, 3, pp. 175-176, (2003)
  • [5] Lotan Y., Cadeddu J.A., Gettman M.T., The new economics of radical prostatectomy: Cost comparison of open, laparoscopic and robot assisted techniques, Journal of Urology, 172, 4, pp. 1431-1435, (2004)
  • [6] Mouraviev V., Nosnik I., Sun L., Robertson C.N., Walther P., Albala D., Moul J.W., Polascik T.J., Financial comparative analysis of minimally invasive surgery to open surgery for localized prostate cancer: A single-institution experience, Urology, 69, 2, pp. 311-314, (2007)
  • [7] Bolenz C., Gupta A., Hotze T., Et al., Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic and open radical prostatectomy, Eur Urol, (2009)
  • [8] Menon M., Tewari A., Baize B., Guillonneau B., Vallancien G., Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy: The Vattikuti Urology Institute experience, Urology, 60, 5, pp. 864-868, (2002)
  • [9] Steinberg P.L., Merguerian P.A., Bihrle III W., Et al., The cost of learning robotic-assisted prostatectomy, Urology, 72, pp. 1068-1072, (2008)
  • [10] Patel V.R., Tully A.S., Holmes R., Lindsay J., Robotic radical prostatectomy in the community setting - The learning curve and beyond: Initial 200 cases, Journal of Urology, 174, 1, pp. 269-272, (2005)