Systematic review of blood diagnostic markers in colorectal cancer

被引:0
|
作者
Stella Nikolaou
Shengyang Qiu
Francesca Fiorentino
Shahnawaz Rasheed
Paris Tekkis
Christos Kontovounisios
机构
[1] Chelsea and Westminster Hospital,Department of Colorectal Surgery
[2] Royal Marsden Hospital,Department of Colorectal Surgery
[3] Imperial College,Department of Surgery and Cancer
[4] Royal Marsden Hospital,undefined
来源
Techniques in Coloproctology | 2018年 / 22卷
关键词
Biomarkers; Diagnosis; Bowel cancer; Tissue; Serum; Review;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the diagnostic ability of blood markers for colorectal cancer (CRC). A systematic review of the literature for diagnostic blood markers for primary human colorectal cancer over the last 5 years was performed. The primary outcome was to assess the diagnostic ability of these markers in diagnosing colorectal cancer. The secondary outcome was to see whether the marker was compared to other markers. The tertiary outcome was to assess diagnostic ability in early versus late CRC, including stage IV disease. We identified 51 studies (29 prospective, 14 retrospective, and 8 meta-analyses). The markers were divided in broadly four groups: nucleic acids (RNA/DNA/messenger RNA/microRNAs), cytokines, antibodies, and proteins. The most promising circulating markers identified among the nucleid acids were NEAT_v2 non-coding RNA, SDC2 methylated DNA, and SEPT9 methylated DNA. The most promising cytokine to detect CRC was interleukin 8, and the most promising circulating proteins were CA11-19 glycoprotein and DC-SIGN/DC-SIGNR. Sensitivities of these markers for detecting primary colorectal carcinoma ranged from 70 to 98% and specificities from 84 to 98.7%. The best studied blood marker was SEPT9 methylated DNA, which showed great variability with sensitivities ranging from 48.2 to 95.6% and specificities from 80 to 98.9%, making its clinical applicability challenging. If combined with fecal immunochemical test (FIT), the sensitivity improved from 78 to 94% in detecting CRC. Methylated SEPT9, methylated SDC2, and -SIGN/DC-SIGNR protein had better sensitivity and specificity than CEA or CA 19-9. With the exception of SEPT9 which is currently being implemented as a screening test for CRC all other markers lacked reproducibility and standardization and were studied in relatively small population samples.
引用
收藏
页码:481 / 498
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] URINARY MARKERS IN COLORECTAL CANCER
    Feng, Bo
    Yue, Fei
    Zheng, Min-Hua
    ADVANCES IN CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, VOL 47, 2009, 47 : 45 - 57
  • [32] Changes in Metabolism as a Diagnostic Tool for Lung Cancer: Systematic Review
    Marien, Hanne
    Derveaux, Elien
    Vanhove, Karolien
    Adriaensens, Peter
    Thomeer, Michiel
    Mesotten, Liesbet
    METABOLITES, 2022, 12 (06)
  • [33] Diagnostic and prognostic factors in patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review
    Beyer, Katharina
    Moris, Lisa
    Lardas, Michael
    Haire, Anna
    Barletta, Francesco
    Scuderi, Simone
    Molnar, Megan
    Herrera, Ronald
    Rauf, Abdul
    Campi, Riccardo
    Greco, Isabella
    Shiranov, Kirill
    Dabestani, Saeed
    van den Broeck, Thomas
    Arun, Sujenthiran
    Gacci, Mauro
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Omar, Muhammad Imran
    MacLennan, Steven
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Farahmand, Bahman
    Vradi, Eleni
    Devecseri, Zsuzsanna
    Asiimwe, Alex
    Zong, Jihong
    Maclennan, Sara J.
    Collette, Laurence
    NDow, James
    Briganti, Alberto
    Bjartell, Anders
    Van Hemelrijck, Mieke
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (04):
  • [34] Blood Markers for the Prognosis of Ischemic Stroke A Systematic Review
    Whiteley, William
    Chong, Wei Li
    Sengupta, Anshuman
    Sandercock, Peter
    STROKE, 2009, 40 (05) : E380 - E389
  • [35] Risk-Predictive and Diagnostic Biomarkers for Colorectal Cancer; a Systematic Review of Studies Using Pre-Diagnostic Blood Samples Collected in Prospective Cohorts and Screening Settings
    Harlid, Sophia
    Gunter, Marc J.
    Van Guelpen, Bethany
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (17)
  • [36] A systematic review of the economic burden of colorectal cancer
    Jafari, Abdosaleh
    Hosseini, Fatemeh A.
    Jalali, Faride S.
    HEALTH SCIENCE REPORTS, 2024, 7 (08)
  • [37] Predictive biomarkers for colorectal cancer: a state-of-the-art systematic review
    Maqbool, Moeez
    Khan, Aden
    Shahzad, Areej
    Sarfraz, Zouina
    Sarfraz, Azza
    Aftab, Hinna
    Jaan, Ali
    BIOMARKERS, 2023, 28 (06) : 562 - 598
  • [38] Diagnostic significance of circulating multiple miRNAs in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xie, Shuduo
    Wang, Yanzhong
    Liu, Huixing
    Wang, Maofeng
    Yu, Haitao
    Qiao, Yingli
    Li, Fengying
    Xie, Xinyou
    Zhang, Jun
    BIOMARKERS IN MEDICINE, 2016, 10 (06) : 661 - 674
  • [39] Investigating the biomarker value of circRNAs in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: a systematic review
    Tahereh Latifi-Pakdehi
    Ali Khezrian
    Amin Doosti-Irani
    Saeid Afshar
    Ali Mahdavinezhad
    Discover Oncology, 15 (1)
  • [40] Conflicting Guidelines: A Systematic Review on the Proper Interval for Colorectal Cancer Treatment
    Molenaar, Charlotte J. L.
    Janssen, Loes
    van der Peet, Donald L.
    Winter, Desmond C.
    Roumen, Rudi M. H.
    Slooter, Gerrit D.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 45 (07) : 2235 - 2250