Periodontal regenerative therapy with enamel matrix derivative in the treatment of intrabony defects: A prospective 2-year study

被引:19
作者
Seshima F. [1 ]
Aoki H. [1 ]
Takeuchi T. [1 ]
Suzuki E. [1 ]
Irokawa D. [1 ]
Makino-Oi A. [1 ]
Sugito H. [2 ,3 ]
Tomita S. [1 ]
Saito A. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Department of Periodontology, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo
[2] Department of Operative Dentistry, Cariology and Pulp Biology, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo
[3] Department of Dental Hygiene, Tokyo Dental Junior College, Tokyo
[4] Oral Health Science Center, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo
关键词
Enamel matrix derivative; Periodontal regeneration; Periodontitis;
D O I
10.1186/s13104-017-2572-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To date, enamel matrix derivative (EMD) has been considered to be one of the few biomaterials for clinical use capable of demonstrating true periodontal regeneration. The aim of this two-center prospective clinical study was to evaluate 2-year outcome of periodontal regenerative therapy using EMD in the treatment of intrabony defects, performed as an 'advanced medical treatment' under the national healthcare system in Japan. Results: Patients with chronic periodontitis who have completed initial periodontal therapy at either of the two dental school clinics were enrolled. Each contributed at least one intrabony defect of ≥3 mm in depth. During surgery, EMD was applied to the defect following debridement. Twenty-two participants (mean age 55.2 years old, 9 men and 13 women) completed 2-year reevaluation, and a total of 42 defects were subjected to data analysis. Mean gains in clinical attachment level (CAL) at 1 and 2 years were 2.9 mm (38% of baseline CAL) and 3.1 mm (41%), respectively, both showing a significant improvement from baseline. There was also a significant reduction in probing depth (PD): mean reductions at 1 and 2 years were 3.2 and 3.3 mm, respectively. There was a progressive improvement in the mean percentages of bone fill from 26% at 1 year to 36% at 2 years. No significant difference in CAL gain at 2 years was found between 3-wall bone defects and other defect types combined. In multiple regression analysis, the baseline PD was significantly associated with CAL gain at 2 years. In this population of patients, the treatment of intrabony defects with EMD yielded clinically favorable outcomes, as assessed by periodontal and radiographical parameters, over a period of 2 years. © 2017 The Author(s).
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Enamel Matrix Derivative and Autogenous Bone Graft for Periodontal Regeneration of Intrabony Defects in Humans: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Annunziata, Marco
    Piccirillo, Angelantonio
    Perillo, Francesco
    Cecoro, Gennaro
    Nastri, Livia
    Guida, Luigi
    MATERIALS, 2019, 12 (16)
  • [32] Enamel matrix proteins in the regenerative therapy of deep intrabony defects - A multicentre randomized controlled clinical trial
    Tonetti, MS
    Lang, NP
    Cortellini, P
    Suvan, JE
    Adriaens, P
    Dubravec, D
    Fonzar, A
    Fourmousis, I
    Mayfield, L
    Rossi, R
    Silvestri, M
    Tiedemann, C
    Topoll, H
    Vangsted, T
    Wallkamm, B
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2002, 29 (04) : 317 - 325
  • [33] The use of enamel matrix derivative in the treatment of periodontal defects: A literature review and meta-analysis
    Venezia, E
    Goldstein, M
    Boyan, BD
    Schwartz, Z
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ORAL BIOLOGY & MEDICINE, 2004, 15 (06) : 382 - 402
  • [34] A comparative study utilizing open flap debridement with and without enamel matrix derivative in the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects: A 12-month re-entry study
    Froum, SJ
    Weinberg, MA
    Rosenberg, E
    Tarnow, D
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2001, 72 (01) : 25 - 34
  • [35] Enamel matrix derivative alone or in combination with a bioactive glass in wide intrabony defects
    Bahar Kuru
    Selçuk Yılmaz
    Kılıçaslan Argın
    Ülkü Noyan
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2006, 10 : 227 - 234
  • [36] Enamel matrix derivative alone or in combination with a bioactive glass in wide intrabony defects
    Kuru, Bahar
    Yilmaz, Selcuk
    Argin, Kihcaslan
    Noyan, Uelkue
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2006, 10 (03) : 227 - 234
  • [37] Periodontal Regenerative Therapy with Enamel Matrix Derivative in Patient with Chronic Periodontitis: A 3.5-year Follow-up Report
    Bizenjima, Takahiro
    Osuka, Yutaka
    Tomita, Sachiyo
    Saito, Atsushi
    BULLETIN OF TOKYO DENTAL COLLEGE, 2019, 60 (02) : 131 - 138
  • [38] Enamel Matrix Proteins as Pre- Orthodontic Therapy for Intrabony Defects
    Bertl, K.
    Laky, M.
    Matejka, M.
    INFORMATIONEN AUS ORTHODONTIE UND KIEFERORTHOPAEDIE, 2010, 42 (01): : 35 - 40
  • [39] Long-term outcome following regenerative periodontal treatment of intrabony defects
    Kanyawat Rattanasuwan
    Krittawat Lertsukprasert
    Supanee Rassameemasmaung
    Chulaluk Komoltri
    Odontology, 2017, 105 : 191 - 201
  • [40] Clinical evaluation of demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft and enamel matrix derivative versus enamel matrix derivative alone for the treatment of periodontal osseous defects in humans
    Gurinsky, BS
    Mills, MP
    Mellonig, JT
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2004, 75 (10) : 1309 - 1318