Periodontal regenerative therapy with enamel matrix derivative in the treatment of intrabony defects: A prospective 2-year study

被引:21
作者
Seshima F. [1 ]
Aoki H. [1 ]
Takeuchi T. [1 ]
Suzuki E. [1 ]
Irokawa D. [1 ]
Makino-Oi A. [1 ]
Sugito H. [2 ,3 ]
Tomita S. [1 ]
Saito A. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Department of Periodontology, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo
[2] Department of Operative Dentistry, Cariology and Pulp Biology, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo
[3] Department of Dental Hygiene, Tokyo Dental Junior College, Tokyo
[4] Oral Health Science Center, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo
关键词
Enamel matrix derivative; Periodontal regeneration; Periodontitis;
D O I
10.1186/s13104-017-2572-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To date, enamel matrix derivative (EMD) has been considered to be one of the few biomaterials for clinical use capable of demonstrating true periodontal regeneration. The aim of this two-center prospective clinical study was to evaluate 2-year outcome of periodontal regenerative therapy using EMD in the treatment of intrabony defects, performed as an 'advanced medical treatment' under the national healthcare system in Japan. Results: Patients with chronic periodontitis who have completed initial periodontal therapy at either of the two dental school clinics were enrolled. Each contributed at least one intrabony defect of ≥3 mm in depth. During surgery, EMD was applied to the defect following debridement. Twenty-two participants (mean age 55.2 years old, 9 men and 13 women) completed 2-year reevaluation, and a total of 42 defects were subjected to data analysis. Mean gains in clinical attachment level (CAL) at 1 and 2 years were 2.9 mm (38% of baseline CAL) and 3.1 mm (41%), respectively, both showing a significant improvement from baseline. There was also a significant reduction in probing depth (PD): mean reductions at 1 and 2 years were 3.2 and 3.3 mm, respectively. There was a progressive improvement in the mean percentages of bone fill from 26% at 1 year to 36% at 2 years. No significant difference in CAL gain at 2 years was found between 3-wall bone defects and other defect types combined. In multiple regression analysis, the baseline PD was significantly associated with CAL gain at 2 years. In this population of patients, the treatment of intrabony defects with EMD yielded clinically favorable outcomes, as assessed by periodontal and radiographical parameters, over a period of 2 years. © 2017 The Author(s).
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Pihlstrom B.L., Michalowicz B.S., Johnson N.W., Periodontal diseases, Lancet, 366, pp. 1809-1820, (2005)
[2]  
Hajishengallis G., Periodontitis: From microbial immune subversion to systemic inflammation, Nat Rev Immunol, 15, pp. 30-44, (2015)
[3]  
Hammarstrom L., Enamel matrix, cementum development and regeneration, J Clin Periodontol, 24, pp. 658-668, (1997)
[4]  
Froum S.J., Weinberg M.A., Rosenberg E., Tarnow D., A comparative study utilizing open flap debridement with and without enamel matrix derivative in the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects: A 12-month re-entry study, J Periodontol, 72, pp. 25-34, (2001)
[5]  
Trombelli L., Bottega S., Zucchelli G., Supracrestal soft tissue preservation with enamel matrix proteins in treatment of deep intrabony defects, J Clin Periodontol, 29, pp. 433-439, (2002)
[6]  
Tonetti M.S., Lang N.P., Cortellini P., Suvan J.E., Adriaens P., Dubravec D., Et al., Enamel matrix proteins in the regenerative therapy of deep intrabony defects: A multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial, J Clin Periodontol, 29, pp. 317-325, (2002)
[7]  
Yilmaz S., Kuru B., Altuna-Kirac E., Enamel matrix proteins in the treatment of periodontal sites with horizontal type of bone loss, J Clin Periodontol, 30, pp. 197-206, (2003)
[8]  
Miron R.J., Sculean A., Cochran D.L., Froum S., Zucchelli G., Nemcovsky C., Et al., Twenty years of enamel matrix derivative: The past, the present and the future, J Clin Periodontol, 43, pp. 668-683, (2016)
[9]  
Fujinami K., Hayakawa H., Ota K., Ida A., Nikaido M., Makiishi T., Et al., Two-year follow-up of treatment of intrabony periodontal defect with enamel matrix derivative, Bull Tokyo Dent Coll, 52, pp. 215-221, (2011)
[10]  
Armitage G.C., Development of a classification system for periodontal diseases and conditions, Ann Periodontol, 4, pp. 1-6, (1999)