Examining Differences in Recovery Outcomes between Male and Female Hip Fracture Patients: Design and Baseline Results of A Prospective Cohort Study from the Baltimore Hip Studies

被引：27
作者：
Orwig D. [1 ,8 ]
Hochberg M.C. [1 ]
Gruber-Baldini A.L. [1 ]
Resnick B. [2 ]
Miller R.R. [3 ]
Hicks G.E. [4 ]
Cappola A.R. [5 ]
Shardell M. [6 ]
Sterling R. [7 ]
Hebel J.R. [1 ]
Johnson R. [1 ]
Magaziner J. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, MD
[2] School of Nursing, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, MD
[3] Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, MA
[4] Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE
[5] University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
[6] Longitudinal Studies Section, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, MD
[7] Department of Orthopedics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
[8] University of Maryland School of Medicine, 660 West Redwood Street, Suite 200, Baltimore, 21201, MD
来源：
The Journal of Frailty & Aging | 2018年 / 7卷 / 3期
关键词：
Hip fracture; recovery; recruitment; sex differences;
D O I：
10.14283/jfa.2018.15
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Background: Incidence of hip fractures in men is expected to increase, yet little is known about consequences of hip fracture in men compared to women. It is important to investigate differences at time of fracture using the newest technologies and methodology regarding metabolic, physiologic, neuromuscular, functional, and clinical outcomes, with attention to design issues for recruiting frail older adults across numerous settings. Objectives: To determine whether at least moderately-sized sex differences exist across several key outcomes after a hip fracture. Design, Setting, & Participants: This prospective cohort study (Baltimore Hip Studies 7th cohort [BHS-7]) was designed to include equal numbers of male and female hip fracture patients to assess sex differences across various outcomes post-hip fracture. Participants were recruited from eight hospitals in the Baltimore metropolitan area within 15 days of admission and were assessed at baseline, 2, 6 and 12 months post-admission. Measurements: Assessments included questionnaire, functional performance evaluation, cognitive testing, measures of body composition, and phlebotomy. Results: Of 1709 hip fracture patients screened from May 2006 through June 2011, 917 (54%) were eligible and 39% (n=362) provided informed consent. The final analytic sample was 339 (168 men and 171 women). At time of fracture, men were sicker (mean Charlson score= 2.4 vs. 1.6; p<0.001) and had worse cognition (3MS score= 82.3 vs. 86.2; p<0.05), and prior to fracture were less likely to be on bisphosphonates (8% vs. 39%; p<0.001) and less physically active (2426 kilocalories/week vs. 3625; p<0.001). Conclusions: This paper provides the study design and methodology for recruiting and assessing hip fracture patients and evidence of baseline and pre-injury sex differences which may affect eventual recovery one year later. © 2018, Serdi and Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
引用
收藏
页码：162 / 169
页数：7
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]  
Stevens J.A., Rudd R.A., The impact of decreasing U.S. hip fracture rates on future hip fracture estimates, Osteoporos In, 24, 10, pp. 2725-2728, (2013)
[2]  
Brown C.A., Starr A.Z., Nunley J.A., Analysis of past secular trends of hip fractures and predicted number in the future 2010–2050, J Orthop Traum, 26, 2, pp. 117-122, (2012)
[3]  
Lofman O., Berglund K., Larsson L., Et al., Changes in hip fracture epidemiology: redistribution between ages, genders and fracture types, Osteoporos In, 13, 1, pp. 18-25, (2002)
[4]  
Abrahamsen B., van. Staa T., Ariely R., Et al., Excess mortality following hip fracture: a systematic epidemiological review, Osteoporos In, 20, 10, pp. 1633-1650, (2009)
[5]  
Hawkes W.G., Wehren L., Orwig D., Et al., Gender differences in functioning after hip fracture, J Gerontol Med Sc, 61A, 5, pp. 495-499, (2006)
[6]  
Orwig D.L., Chan J., Magaziner J., Hip fracture and its consequences: differences between men and women, Orthop Clin North A, 37, 4, pp. 611-622, (2006)
[7]  
Wehren L.E., Hawkes W.G., Hebel J.R., Et al., Bone mineral density, soft tissue body composition, strength, and functioning after hip fracture, J Gerontol Med Sc, 60, 1, pp. 80-84, (2005)
[8]  
Wehren L.E., Hawkes W., Orwig D., Et al., Gender differences in mortality after hip fracture: The role of infection, J Bone Miner Re, 18, 12, pp. 2231-2237, (2003)
[9]  
Panula J., Pihlajamaki H., Mattila V.M., Et al., Mortality and cause of death in hip fracture patients aged 65 or older: a population-based study, BMC Musculoskelet Disor, 12, (2011)
[10]  
Haentjens P., Magaziner J., Colon-Emeric C.S., Et al., Meta-analysis: Excess mortality after hip fracture among older women and men, Ann Intern Me, 152, 6, pp. 380-390, (2010)
12345678