Changes in bone mineral density in Down syndrome individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
作者
Y. Zhang
Z. Tian
S. Ye
Q. Mu
X. Wang
S. Ren
X. Hou
W. Yu
J. Guo
机构
[1] Peking University People’s Hospital,Department of Pediatric
[2] Peking University People’s Hospital,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
[3] Peking University People’s Hospital,Department of Central Laboratory & Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology
来源
Osteoporosis International | 2022年 / 33卷
关键词
Bone mineral density; Down syndrome; Osteoporosis; Volumetric bone mineral density;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Data evaluating changes in bone mineral density (BMD) in Down syndrome (DS) individuals remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to better understand associations between BMD and DS. A systematic literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library up until 1st January 2021 was conducted. We used the keywords “bone mineral density” and “Down Syndrome.” Fifteen studies were included. Overall, our results showed a significant decrease in BMD of total body (TB BMD) [MD =  − 0.18; 95% CI (− 0.23 and − 0.12), P < 0.00001, I2 = 89%], total hip (TH BMD) [MD =  − 0.12; 95% CI (− 0.15 and − 0.10), P < 0.00001, I2 = 0%], lumbar spine (LS BMD) [MD =  − 0.12; 95% CI (− 0.14 and − 0.09), P < 0.00001, I2 = 18%], and femoral neck (FN BMD) [MD =  − 0.08; 95% CI (− 0.10 and − 0.06), P < 0.00001, I2 = 0%] in DS individuals when compared with controls. Moreover, the volumetric BMD of lumbar spine (LS vBMD) [MD =  − 0.01; 95% CI (− 0.02 and − 0.01), P = 0.0004, I2 = 19%] also showed a decreasing tendency while the volumetric BMD of the femoral neck (FN vBMD) [MD = 0.01; 95% CI (0.00 and 0.02), P = 0.02, I2 = 0%] was elevated in DS individuals versus controls. These findings demonstrated that individuals with DS had a decreased total and regional (TH, LS, and FN) BMD when compared with the general population. Additionally, when BMD was adjusted for skeletal volume, LS vBMD was also lower, while FN vBMD was elevated in DS individuals versus controls.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 37
页数:10
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]  
Roizen NJ(2003)Down’s syndrome Lancet 361 1281-1289
[2]  
Patterson D(2020)Osteoporosis Nat Rev Dis Primers 6 9-150
[3]  
Antonarakis SE(2000)Clinical, social, and ethical implications of changing life expectancy in Down syndrome Clin Orthop Relat Res 372 139-286
[4]  
Lane JM(2004)Genetic syndromes in man with potential relevance to the pathobiology of aging Dev Med Child Neurol 46 282-39
[5]  
Russell L(1978)Bone mass, gonadal function and biochemical assessment in young men with trisomy 21 Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser 14 5-212
[6]  
Khan SN(2002)Bone mass assessment in a cohort of adults with Down syndrome: a cross-sectional study Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 100 208-324
[7]  
Bittles AH(2017)Sarcopenia-related parameters in adults with Down syndrome: a cross-sectional exploratory study Intellect Dev Disabil 55 315-99
[8]  
Glasson EJ(2019)Maximizing bone mineral mass gain during growth for the prevention of fractures in the adolescents and the elderly Exp Gerontol 119 93-91
[9]  
Martin GM(2015)The use of a frailty index to predict adverse health outcomes (falls, fractures, hospitalization, medication use, comorbid conditions) in people with intellectual disabilities Eur J Intern Med 26 385-305
[10]  
Sakadamis A(2010)Risk of fractures in an intermediate care facility for persons with mental retardation Bone 46 294-47